top of page

Human–Animal Bond

The relationship between humans and animals is one of the oldest and most influential connections in human history. Across cultures, geographic regions, and historical periods, animals have contributed to daily life as companions, working partners, sources of livelihood, cultural symbols, and members of social communities. These relationships extend far beyond practical functions and often involve emotional, psychological, social, and behavioral dimensions that influence both human and animal well-being.

The concept known as the Human–Animal Bond describes the dynamic and mutually influential relationship between people and animals. Researchers from veterinary medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, public health, animal behavior, and social work have explored how interactions with animals affect human experiences throughout life. The field continues to expand as evidence accumulates regarding the role of companion animals and other human–animal interactions in social connectedness, emotional support, quality of life, resilience, and community engagement (Serpell, 2017; Fine, 2020).

Modern understanding of the Human–Animal Bond recognizes that relationships between humans and animals exist within broader ecological, social, and cultural systems. Contemporary research increasingly examines these relationships through interdisciplinary frameworks that integrate veterinary science, public health, mental health, social sciences, and the One Health approach (Woldehanna & Zimicki, 2014; Overgaauw et al., 2020).

As scientific interest in human–animal interaction grows, the Human–Animal Bond has emerged as an important area of study within discussions of mental health, social support, aging, child development, community resilience, and overall well-being.

What This Major Pillar Covers

 

This pillar introduces the scientific foundations and practical significance of the Human–Animal Bond. It explores how relationships between humans and animals develop, change throughout life, and influence individuals, families, and communities.

Major topics include:

  • Historical and scientific foundations of the Human–Animal Bond

  • Psychological and social dimensions of human–animal relationships

  • Human–animal interactions across different life stages

  • The role of animals in social support and connectedness

  • Community and societal impacts of human–animal relationships

  • Current research trends in anthrozoology and human–animal interaction science

 

This pillar serves as the parent resource for three interconnected minor pillars:

Foundations of the Human–Animal Bond

 

The scientific, psychological, historical, and theoretical basis of relationships between humans and animals.

Learn more in our guide to Foundations of the Human–Animal Bond.

Lifespan Perspectives

 

How human–animal relationships influence experiences during childhood, adulthood, and older age.

Learn more in our guide to Lifespan Perspectives.

Social and Community Impacts

 

The influence of animals on social relationships, communities, and public well-being.

Learn more in our guide to Social and Community Impacts.

Why This Area Matters

 

The Human–Animal Bond is relevant to numerous aspects of human and animal life. Millions of households worldwide share daily experiences with companion animals, while many communities interact with animals through agriculture, conservation, education, recreation, therapy programs, and wildlife encounters.

Research suggests that human–animal relationships can influence emotional experiences, perceptions of companionship, social engagement, and feelings of connectedness (Walsh, 2009; Fine, 2020). Investigators have also explored how companion animals may function as important social partners within broader support networks (LeBlanc, 2019; Arkow, 2019).

The significance of these relationships became particularly visible during periods of widespread social disruption, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple studies reported that animals served as sources of companionship and continuity during times of isolation and uncertainty (Ratschen et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2021).

The Human–Animal Bond is also important from a veterinary perspective. Positive relationships between humans and animals influence animal care, welfare, communication, and the overall quality of interactions between people and the animals under their stewardship (Rault et al., 2020).

How This Major Pillar Relates to Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction

 

The Human–Animal Bond forms one of the foundational concepts within the broader field of Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction.

Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction examines how contact, relationships, and shared experiences with animals influence psychological, emotional, and social processes. Within this larger framework, the Human–Animal Bond focuses specifically on the nature and quality of relationships that develop between humans and animals.

Researchers have proposed that these relationships may involve mechanisms similar to those observed in human social relationships, including attachment, caregiving behaviors, emotional reciprocity, social support, and companionship (Lasher, 1998; Prato-Previde et al., 2022).

The Human–Animal Bond also intersects with:

  • Psychology

  • Psychiatry

  • Public health

  • Social work

  • Gerontology

  • Child development

  • Veterinary medicine

  • Animal welfare science

  • Anthrozoology

 

As a result, understanding the Human–Animal Bond provides a foundation for interpreting a broad range of research examining human–animal interactions and their implications for both people and animals.

Key Concepts Within This Pillar

 

Several concepts frequently appear in Human–Animal Bond research.

Human–Animal Interaction

 

Human–animal interaction refers to any form of contact or engagement between humans and animals. Interactions may be direct or indirect, structured or spontaneous, and may occur in homes, farms, healthcare settings, schools, communities, or natural environments (McCune et al., 2014).

Attachment

 

Attachment refers to emotional connections that develop between individuals. Researchers have explored attachment-related processes in human–animal relationships, particularly involving companion animals (Prato-Previde et al., 2022; Fine, 2018).

Social Support

 

Social support involves emotional, informational, or practical resources derived from social relationships. Companion animals are frequently studied as contributors to perceived social support networks (Hill et al., 2020; LeBlanc, 2019).

Anthrozoology

 

Anthrozoology is the interdisciplinary study of interactions and relationships between humans and animals. It draws upon veterinary medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, biology, and public health to understand the human–animal connection (Hurn, 2014; Khandai & Shrivastava, 2023).

One Health

 

The One Health framework recognizes the interconnected health of humans, animals, and the environment. Human–animal relationships are increasingly examined through this lens to better understand their broader societal implications (Overgaauw et al., 2020; Orchard et al., 2026).

Foundations of the Human–Animal Bond

 

The Human–Animal Bond did not emerge suddenly in modern society. Archaeological, historical, anthropological, and sociological evidence suggests that humans and animals have shared interconnected lives for thousands of years. Relationships have evolved alongside changing human societies, resulting in diverse forms of companionship, cooperation, caregiving, and mutual adaptation (Hines, 2003; Oma & Goldhahn, 2020).

Contemporary research often describes the Human–Animal Bond as a dynamic and reciprocal relationship rather than a one-directional interaction. This perspective recognizes that both humans and animals influence one another's behaviors, experiences, and environments (Lasher, 1998; Verheggen et al., 2017).

The scientific study of these relationships gained momentum during the late twentieth century, contributing to the emergence of anthrozoology as a formal field of inquiry. Researchers began examining how animals influence human behavior, emotional experiences, social relationships, and quality of life, as well as how human actions affect animal welfare and well-being (Beck & Katcher, 2003; Collado et al., 2022).

Modern frameworks emphasize several interacting dimensions of the Human–Animal Bond:

  • Emotional connections

  • Attachment processes

  • Social support mechanisms

  • Communication and mutual responsiveness

  • Caregiving relationships

  • Shared environments and experiences

  • Cultural and societal influences

 

Research also highlights the complexity of these relationships. Human–animal bonds are not identical across individuals, species, cultures, or circumstances. Factors such as personal experiences, family structures, cultural values, life stage, and animal characteristics may shape how relationships develop and are perceived (Prato-Previde et al., 2022; Brown et al., 2023).

Another important area of study involves empathy, anthropomorphism, and emotional interpretation. Researchers continue to explore how humans understand animals' emotions and behaviors, and how these perceptions influence relationship quality (Duque et al., 2024; Prato-Previde et al., 2022).

Today, Human–Animal Bond research extends beyond companion animal ownership and includes animal-assisted interventions, service animals, agricultural settings, conservation contexts, wildlife interactions, and community-based programs. This broad scope reflects growing recognition that relationships with animals represent an important component of human social and environmental experiences.

Lifespan Perspectives

 

Human–animal relationships are not static. They develop, evolve, and often change throughout an individual's life. Researchers increasingly examine the Human–Animal Bond through a lifespan perspective, recognizing that interactions with animals may serve different roles during childhood, adulthood, and older age (Pachana et al., 2011; Bures & Gee, 2020).

A lifespan approach helps explain why human–animal relationships remain relevant across diverse populations and circumstances. While individual experiences vary considerably, studies suggest that animals frequently become integrated into family structures, social networks, daily routines, and personal identities throughout life.

Human–Animal Relationships During Childhood

 

For many children, animals offer some of the earliest opportunities to develop relationships beyond their immediate family. Companion animals often become part of daily routines and shared family experiences.

Researchers have explored how children interact with animals through play, caregiving activities, observation, communication, and emotional engagement. Human–animal relationships during childhood have been studied in relation to social development, empathy, emotional awareness, responsibility, and learning experiences (Fine, 2018; McCune et al., 2014).

Anthrozoological research suggests that interactions with animals may provide unique opportunities for children to practice caregiving behaviors and develop understanding of the needs of other living beings (Videla et al., 2015). These experiences may contribute to broader discussions regarding social and emotional development.

Children's relationships with animals are also shaped by cultural values, family attitudes, socioeconomic conditions, and opportunities for animal interaction. Consequently, experiences vary widely among individuals and communities.

Human–Animal Relationships During Adulthood

 

During adulthood, relationships with animals often become integrated into broader social, family, and lifestyle structures.

Companion animals may be viewed as family members, social partners, sources of routine, or contributors to household dynamics (Walsh, 2009). Research has examined how adults incorporate animals into daily life and how these relationships intersect with employment, family responsibilities, recreation, and community participation.

The concept of social support frequently appears in studies involving adult human–animal relationships. Companion animals have been investigated as components of broader support networks that include family, friends, coworkers, and community members (Hill et al., 2020; Hanrahan, 2019).

Research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic generated substantial interest in this topic. Several studies explored how human–animal interactions related to experiences of social isolation, loneliness, and emotional well-being during periods of restricted social contact (Ratschen et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2021).

Investigators have also examined the diversity of adult human–animal relationships across different populations and social contexts. Studies involving crisis situations, marginalized communities, and diverse household structures continue to expand understanding of how animals fit within contemporary social systems (Oosthuizen et al., 2023; Videla et al., 2023).

Human–Animal Relationships in Older Adulthood

 

Older adulthood represents one of the most extensively studied areas within Human–Animal Bond research.

As populations age globally, researchers have become increasingly interested in understanding how animals contribute to social connectedness, emotional experiences, and quality of life among older adults (Gee & Mueller, 2019; Resnick & McCune, 2019).

Many studies focus on the role of companion animals within social networks. Researchers have explored whether relationships with animals may influence feelings of companionship, social engagement, and perceived connectedness among older adults (Barrett et al., 2024; Beaupré et al., 2025).

Recent reviews have examined how human–animal interactions relate to broader discussions of aging, frailty, social participation, and well-being in later life (Taeckens et al., 2023). Community programs that facilitate human–animal interactions among older adults have also become a growing area of scholarly interest (Dolby, 2024).

Emerging research further suggests that social relationships—including those involving animals—may contribute to broader conversations regarding healthy aging and social connectedness across the lifespan (Berendzen et al., 2023; Iannuzzi et al., 2024).

Attachment, Grief, and Lifelong Relationships

 

Human–animal relationships often involve significant emotional investment. Consequently, researchers have also explored attachment processes, relationship maintenance, grief, and loss throughout the lifespan.

Studies indicate that many individuals describe companion animals with family-oriented language and report meaningful emotional attachments to them (Walsh, 2009; Prato-Previde et al., 2022).

Because these relationships may persist for many years, scholars have also examined experiences associated with illness, aging, separation, and loss of animal companions (Fine, 2019; Whipple, 2021). This body of work contributes to understanding the emotional significance of animals across different life stages.

Social and Community Impacts

 

Although Human–Animal Bond discussions often focus on individual experiences, the effects of human–animal relationships extend beyond the individual level. Increasingly, researchers examine how animals influence families, neighborhoods, communities, institutions, and broader social systems.

This perspective recognizes that human–animal relationships exist within social environments rather than in isolation.

Animals as Components of Social Networks

 

Companion animals frequently occupy positions within household and social networks. Research suggests that animals may contribute to social interactions by creating opportunities for communication, shared activities, and relationship-building among people (Arkow, 2019; LeBlanc, 2019).

The concept of social capital has become increasingly important within Human–Animal Bond research. Social capital refers to resources that arise from social connections, trust, and community relationships. Some scholars have proposed that animals may facilitate the development of social capital by increasing opportunities for interaction among community members (Arkow, 2019).

Examples include:

  • Interactions between neighbors during walks

  • Community participation through animal-related activities

  • Shared experiences among animal caregivers

  • Increased opportunities for social engagement

 

Researchers continue to investigate how these mechanisms function across different populations and settings.

Human–Animal Bonds and Community Resilience

 

The Human–Animal Bond has also been examined within discussions of resilience and adaptation.

Studies exploring adversity, crisis situations, and social disruption suggest that animals may serve as meaningful social partners during periods of uncertainty (Applebaum et al., 2021; Hill et al., 2020).

Research involving disaster response, housing instability, and crisis intervention increasingly recognizes the importance of considering human–animal relationships when evaluating community needs and support systems (Oosthuizen et al., 2023; Arkow, 2020).

These findings have encouraged interdisciplinary collaborations among veterinary professionals, public health practitioners, social workers, and community organizations.

Human–Animal Relationships and Public Health

 

The Human–Animal Bond is increasingly discussed within public health and One Health frameworks.

One Health emphasizes the interconnected health of people, animals, and the environment. Human–animal relationships represent an important component of this framework because interactions with animals influence social systems, environmental contexts, and health-related behaviors (Overgaauw et al., 2020; Woldehanna & Zimicki, 2014).

Recent publications advocate greater collaboration between veterinary services and the human health sector to address issues related to animal companionship, social support, and community well-being (Orchard et al., 2026).

The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches to human–animal interactions and social connectedness (Ng et al., 2021; Hughes et al., 2021).

Human–Animal Bonds and Animal Welfare

 

Community impacts are not limited to human outcomes. Human–animal relationships also affect animal welfare.

Positive interactions between people and animals are associated with discussions of welfare, caregiving quality, trust, communication, and animal experiences within human-managed environments (Rault et al., 2020).

Veterinary researchers increasingly emphasize that understanding the Human–Animal Bond requires consideration of both human and animal perspectives. This reciprocal approach aligns with contemporary views of welfare science and ethical animal stewardship.

Cultural and Global Perspectives

 

Human–animal relationships differ substantially across societies and cultures.

Anthropologists, sociologists, and ethnozoologists have documented the diverse ways humans interact with animals worldwide, including relationships involving companionship, spirituality, food systems, conservation, labor, recreation, and cultural identity (Alves, 2017; Alves & Souto, 2015).

Understanding these cultural differences helps researchers avoid overly narrow definitions of the Human–Animal Bond and promotes more inclusive perspectives regarding human–animal relationships globally.

As the field continues to expand, cultural diversity remains an important consideration in both research and policy discussions concerning human–animal interaction.

Current Research Themes

 

Human–Animal Bond research has expanded significantly during the past several decades. What was once considered a niche area of inquiry has evolved into a multidisciplinary field encompassing veterinary medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, neuroscience, public health, gerontology, animal welfare science, and One Health research.

Several major themes currently dominate the scientific literature.

Human–Animal Relationships and Mental Health

 

One of the most active areas of research examines associations between human–animal relationships and psychological well-being.

Researchers continue investigating how companion animals relate to experiences such as social connectedness, loneliness, emotional support, resilience, and quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated interest in this area and spurred numerous studies examining how animals shaped people's experiences during periods of social isolation (Ratschen et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2021; Hughes et al., 2021).

 

At the same time, researchers emphasize the complexity of these relationships and the importance of avoiding overly simplistic interpretations. Ongoing investigations seek to clarify which populations, contexts, and relationship characteristics may influence observed outcomes (Rodriguez et al., 2021).

Aging, Longevity, and Social Connectedness

 

A growing body of research explores the role of human–animal interactions in healthy aging.

Researchers have examined how companion animals fit within social support networks, influence perceptions of companionship, and contribute to social engagement among older adults (Gee & Mueller, 2019; Barrett et al., 2024).

This research aligns with broader scientific interest in the relationship between social connectedness, aging, and health outcomes across species (Vila, 2021; Snyder-Mackler et al., 2020).

Attachment, Empathy, and Relationship Quality

 

Many contemporary studies focus on understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying Human–Animal Bonds.

Researchers continue investigating:

  • Attachment processes

  • Emotional closeness

  • Empathy

  • Anthropomorphism

  • Relationship satisfaction

  • Caregiving behaviors

 

Recent studies have highlighted the complexity of these constructs and their influence on how humans perceive and interact with animals (Prato-Previde et al., 2022; Ellis et al., 2024).

Human–Animal Interaction and Public Health

 

Public health researchers increasingly recognize human–animal interaction as a relevant topic within discussions of community well-being, social isolation, health equity, and One Health.

Interdisciplinary collaborations involving veterinary professionals, social workers, healthcare providers, and community organizations have expanded in recent years (Arkow, 2020; Orchard et al., 2026).

This growing emphasis reflects recognition that human, animal, and environmental health are interconnected.

Anthrozoology and Emerging Directions

 

Anthrozoology continues to evolve as a scientific discipline.

Recent bibliometric analyses demonstrate increasing publication rates, broader international participation, and greater methodological diversity within Human–Animal Bond research (Collado et al., 2022; Hill et al., 2025).

Emerging areas of inquiry include:

  • Human–animal relationships in diverse cultural contexts

  • Human–animal interactions during crises

  • One Health approaches to social well-being

  • Human–animal relationships and environmental sustainability

  • Digital technologies and human–animal interaction research

  • Cross-species social behavior and attachment

 

These themes are expected to continue shaping future research and policy discussions.

Frequently Asked Questions

 

What is the Human–Animal Bond?

The Human–Animal Bond refers to the dynamic relationship between humans and animals characterized by ongoing interactions, emotional connections, and mutual influences. The concept encompasses social, psychological, behavioral, and cultural dimensions of human–animal relationships (Serpell, 2017).

Why is the Human–Animal Bond important?

The Human–Animal Bond is important because animals play meaningful roles in human lives and communities. Researchers study these relationships to better understand their influence on social connectedness, emotional experiences, quality of life, community engagement, and animal welfare (Fine, 2020; Wells, 2019).

 

What is anthrozoology?

Anthrozoology is the interdisciplinary study of interactions and relationships between humans and animals. The field integrates knowledge from veterinary medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, biology, public health, and animal behavior science (Hurn, 2014; Irvine, 2012).

 

How does the Human–Animal Bond relate to mental health?

Researchers investigate how relationships with animals are associated with social support, companionship, resilience, emotional experiences, and psychological well-being. This area remains an active field of scientific inquiry within Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction research (Fine, 2020; Rodriguez et al., 2021).

 

Is the Human–Animal Bond only about pets?

No. Although companion animals are frequently studied, the Human–Animal Bond also encompasses relationships with working, service, and therapy animals; farm and zoo animals; wildlife; and animals encountered in educational or conservation settings (Hosey & Melfi, 2019; Serpell, 2017).

Explore Related Topics

 

Continue exploring the Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction Veterinary Knowledge System:

Foundations of the Human–Animal Bond

 

Understanding the historical, psychological, biological, and social foundations that shape relationships between humans and animals.

 

Learn more in our guide to Foundations of the Human–Animal Bond.

Lifespan Perspectives

 

Explore how Human–Animal Bonds develop and change throughout childhood, adulthood, and older age.

 

Learn more in our guide to Lifespan Perspectives.

Social and Community Impacts

 

Discover how human–animal relationships influence social support, community engagement, public health, and societal well-being.

 

Learn more in our guide to Social and Community Impacts.

Mental Health & Human–Animal Interaction

 

Return to the parent system page for a broader overview of this Veterinary Knowledge System.

Written by Athena  Angela Gaffud, DVM

 

Disclaimer

This content is intended for general educational purposes only and is informed by established veterinary research and consensus. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. For concerns about an individual animals’s health or well-being, consult a licensed veterinarian.

References

  • Applebaum, J., MacLean, E. L., & McDonald, S. E. (2021). Love, fear, and the human-animal bond: On adversity and multispecies relationships. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 7, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100071

  • Arkow, P. (2019). The social capital of companion animals. In Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815395-6.00005-5

  • Arkow, P. (2020). Human–animal relationships and social work: Opportunities beyond the veterinary environment. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37(6), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00697-x

  • Barrett, B., Fitzgerald, A., Al-Wahsh, H., & Musa, M. (2024). Animal companionship and psycho-social well-being: Findings from a national study of community-dwelling aging Canadians. Journal of Aging Studies, 70, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101247

  • Beaupré, C. A., Woodsworth, J., & Epp, T. (2025). Animal connections: A scoping review towards enhanced understanding of companion animal interactions in assessment of social connectedness in older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980825100421

  • Beck, A. M., & Katcher, A. H. (2003). Future directions in human-animal bond research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255214

  • Bures, R., & Gee, N. R. (2020). Well-being over the life course: Incorporating human–animal interaction. Springer.

  • Collado, E. B., Martín, P., & Serena, O. (2022). Mapping human–animal interaction studies: A bibliometric analysis. Anthrozoös, 36(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2022.2084994

  • Ellis, A., Loughnan, S., Hawkins, R., & Stanton, S. C. E. (2024). The associations between human–companion animal relationship duration, companion animal life stage, and relationship quality. Animals, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111606

  • Fine, A. H. (2018). The human-animal bond over the lifespan: A primer for mental health professionals. In Clinician's Guide to Treating Companion Animal Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812962-3.00001-0

  • Fine, A. H. (2019). The eternal bond. In Pet Loss, Grief, and Therapeutic Interventions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505201-2

  • Fine, A. H. (2020). The psycho-social impact of human-animal interactions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113964

  • Gee, N. R., & Mueller, M. K. (2019). A systematic review of research on pet ownership and animal interactions among older adults. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569903

  • Hanrahan, C. (2019). Social work and human animal bonds and benefits in health research. Critical Social Work. https://doi.org/10.22329/csw.v14i1.5873

  • Hill, L. N., Winefield, H. R., & Bennett, P. C. (2020). Are stronger bonds better? Examining the relationship between the human–animal bond and human social support, and its impact on resilience. Australian Psychologist, 55(6), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12466

  • Hines, L. M. (2003). Historical perspectives on the human-animal bond. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255206

  • Hosey, Geoff, and Vicky Melfi (eds), 'Introduction', in Geoff Hosey, and Vicky Melfi (eds), Anthrozoology: Human-Animal Interactions in Domesticated and Wild Animals (Oxford, 2018; online edn, Oxford Academic, 21 Feb. 2019), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753629.003.0001

  • Hughes, A., Braun, L., Putnam, A., Martinez, D., & Fine, A. H. (2021). Advancing human–animal interaction to counter social isolation and loneliness in the time of COVID-19. Animals, 11(8), 2325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082325

  • Iannuzzi, V., Narboux-Nême, N., Lehoczki, A., Levi, G., & Giuliani, C. (2024). Stay social, stay young: A bioanthropological outlook on the processes linking sociality and ageing. GeroScience, 47, 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01416-5

  • Irvine, L. (2012). Sociology and anthrozoology: Symbolic interactionist contributions. Anthrozoös, 25(Suppl. 1), S123–S137. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13353430377174

  • McCune, S., Kruger, K. A., Griffin, J. A., Esposito, L., Freund, L., Hurley, K. J., & Bures, R. (2014). Evolution of research into the mutual benefits of human–animal interaction. Animal Frontiers, 4(3), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0022

  • Ng, Z., Griffin, T., & Braun, L. (2021). The new status quo: Enhancing access to human–animal interactions to alleviate social isolation and loneliness in the time of COVID-19. Animals, 11(10), 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102769

  • Orchard, R. J., Scarbrough, E., Crow, A., Baldwin, M., & Moreau, C. (2026). One Health and human-animal bond intervention strategies: Assessing veterinary-social service collaborations. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1656241

  • Overgaauw, P. A. M., Vinke, C. M., Van Hagen, M. A. E., & Lipman, L. J. A. (2020). A One Health perspective on the human–companion animal relationship with emphasis on zoonotic aspects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3789. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113789

  • Pachana, N. A., Massavelli, B., & Robleda-Gomez, S. (2011). A developmental psychological perspective on the human–animal bond. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_9

  • Prato-Previde, E., Ricci, E. B., & Colombo, E. (2022). The complexity of the human–animal bond: Empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism in human–animal relationships and animal hoarding. Animals, 12(20), 2835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202835

  • Ratschen, E., Shoesmith, E., Shahab, L., Silva, K., Kale, D., Toner, P., Reeve, C., & Mills, D. S. (2020). Human-animal relationships and interactions during the COVID-19 lockdown phase in the UK. PLoS ONE, 15(9), e0239397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239397

  • Rault, J. L., Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., & Hemsworth, P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 590867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.590867

  • Rodriguez, K. E., Herzog, H., & Gee, N. R. (2021). Variability in human-animal interaction research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 619600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.619600

  • Serpell, J. A. (2017). The human-animal bond. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.013.31

  • Snyder-Mackler, N., Burger, J. R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D. W., Noppert, G. A., Campos, F. A., et al. (2020). Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science, 368(6493). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax9553

  • Taeckens, A., Corcoran, M., Wang, K., & Morris, K. (2023). Examining human-animal interactions and their effect on multidimensional frailty in later life: A scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214127

  • Walsh, F. (2009). Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x

  • Wells, D. L. (2019). The state of research on human–animal relations: Implications for human health. Anthrozoös, 32(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1569902

  • Whipple, E. E. (2021). The human–animal bond and grief and loss: Implications for social work practice. Families in Society, 102(4), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894211015132

  • Woldehanna, S., & Zimicki, S. (2014). An expanded One Health model: Integrating social science and One Health to inform study of the human-animal interface. Social Science & Medicine, 129, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.059

  • Videla, M. D., Olarte, M. A., & Camacho, J. M. (2015). ANTROZOOLOGÍA: DEFINICIONES, ÁREAS DE DESARROLLO Y APLICACIONES PRÁCTICAS PARA PROFESIONALES DE LA SALUD. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 11(10). Retrieved from https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5592

  • Videla, M. D., Rodríguez, R. D., Martos-Montes, R., Pérez, D. O., & Calvo, P. (2023). The LGBTQ+ People-Animal Bond: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Companion Animals on LGBTQ+ People. Journal of Homosexuality, 71, 934 - 957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2150920

bottom of page