Reproduction & Fertility in Livestock
From a systems-based veterinary perspective, reproduction represents the foundational biological driver of livestock population health, herd productivity, and long-term genetic resilience. Across cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, poultry, and other production animals, reproductive performance influences whether animals conceive, maintain pregnancy, produce viable offspring, and contribute efficiently to the next generation. At the herd, flock, or production-system level, reproductive efficiency also affects the pace of genetic progress and the economic sustainability of livestock enterprises.
\
Livestock reproduction and fertility are therefore broader than conception alone. Fertility is a complex biological outcome influenced by reproductive physiology, genetics, endocrine regulation, nutrition, environmental conditions, stress, maternal factors, male fertility, and, increasingly, interactions between reproductive tissues and their microbial environments. Species-specific reproductive physiology further means that the mammalian endocrine and uterine mechanisms governing fertility in cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs cannot be directly applied to avian species like poultry, which rely on distinct photoperiodic pathways, non-luteal ovulatory cycles, and specialized utero-vaginal sperm storage (Khan & Khezri, 2024; Zhou et al., 2026).
​
The reproductive process itself is highly coordinated. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis regulates reproductive hormones, follicular and testicular function, ovulation, gamete production, and reproductive cyclicity. Successful reproduction then depends on a sequence of events extending from gamete quality and fertilization through early embryonic development, pregnancy establishment, parturition, and neonatal survival. Disruption at any stage can reduce reproductive efficiency.
​
Modern livestock reproduction also extends beyond conventional breeding. Artificial insemination, embryo transfer, in vitro embryo production, genomic selection, reproductive biomarkers, precision livestock technologies, and other assisted reproductive technologies increasingly connect reproductive management with genetics and data-driven production systems. These technologies can accelerate genetic improvement and expand the reproductive potential of selected animals, although their effectiveness depends on biological factors such as gamete quality, recipient management, pregnancy establishment, and species-specific reproductive characteristics.
​
This major pillar provides an evidence-based overview of these interconnected processes. It introduces the biological and management concepts underlying livestock fertility and connects them with three related areas: maternal and neonatal health, artificial insemination and embryo transfer, and reproductive nutrition and genetics.
​
What This Major Pillar Covers
Reproduction and fertility encompass the biological processes and management factors that determine reproductive success throughout the livestock production cycle.
​
At the physiological level, reproductive function depends on coordinated endocrine signaling, gonadal activity, gamete production, ovulation or sperm release, fertilization, embryo development, and pregnancy establishment. Reproductive hormones and signaling pathways regulate these processes, while genetic variation contributes to differences in reproductive traits between individuals and populations. Research into reproductive regulation increasingly examines the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences, including genes, regulatory RNAs, proteins, metabolites, and other biological markers.
​
At the production level, reproductive performance may be evaluated through measures such as conception rate, pregnancy rate, calving or lambing rate, litter size, age at puberty, reproductive interval, semen quality, and offspring survival. The appropriate measure depends on species and production system.
​
Environmental conditions are also important. Heat stress can disrupt reproductive function in both females and males, while chronic physiological stress can affect endocrine regulation and reproductive performance. Seasonal reproductive patterns are particularly relevant in species whose reproductive activity is strongly influenced by photoperiod and environmental conditions. These influences demonstrate why reproductive management cannot be separated from the broader livestock health environment (Van Wettere et al., 2021; Tada et al., 2025).
​
The pillar also considers reproductive outcomes across generations. Maternal nutrition, maternal body condition, environmental stressors, and conditions during fetal and early-life development may influence the later reproductive function of offspring. This concept of developmental programming expands reproductive health beyond the immediate breeding period and emphasizes the importance of conditions experienced before an animal reaches reproductive maturity (Akbarinejad & Cushman, 2024).
​
Finally, contemporary reproductive science increasingly integrates genetics, genomics, reproductive biotechnology, precision livestock farming, and omics-based approaches. These fields seek to improve understanding and prediction of fertility while supporting more efficient breeding programs.
​
Why This Area Matters
Reproductive performance affects livestock production at several levels.
​
At the individual-animal level, fertility determines whether an animal successfully contributes offspring to the production system. At the herd or flock level, reproductive efficiency influences the number and timing of offspring produced and therefore affects replacement rates, production cycles, and genetic progress. At the population level, reproductive traits are key components of breeding programs because genetic improvement depends on the ability to reproduce selected animals and pass on desirable traits to subsequent generations.
The relationship between production and reproduction can also be complex. Dairy cattle provide an important example. Historical selection for increased milk production has been associated with unfavorable changes in fertility, driven primarily by high metabolic clearance rates of progesterone and estradiol and suppressed luteinizing hormone pulse frequency during negative energy balance. More recent genomic selection approaches have created opportunities to balance production traits with reproductive performance, showing how breeding objectives can influence the biological capacity for reproduction over time (Spencer, 2013; Strabel & Colebjohn, 2026).
​
Fertility is also economically important because reproductive failure can interrupt production cycles and reduce the efficiency with which genetic investments are realized. Pregnancy establishment and accurate pregnancy diagnosis, for example, directly affect reproductive management and livestock enterprise profitability (Ott et al., 2024).
​
However, reproductive efficiency should not be interpreted as a single biological trait. Fertility is influenced by both females and males, and reproductive success requires successful interaction between the two. Sperm quality, including motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and other aspects of sperm function, can influence fertility outcomes. Increasing attention to male reproductive phenotypes and sperm biomarkers is therefore expanding the traditional focus on female reproductive performance (Long, 2020; Hassanine et al., 2026).
​
Reproduction is also increasingly linked to sustainability. Improving reproductive efficiency can contribute to more effective use of breeding animals and production resources, while genetic improvement can influence the productivity and resilience of future generations. For these reasons, reproductive health represents an integral part of the broader livestock health picture rather than an isolated production trait.
​
How This Major Pillar Relates to the Livestock Health Overview
Reproduction and fertility sit within the broader livestock health framework because reproductive outcomes reflect interactions among multiple physiological systems.
​
The Livestock Health Overview provides the system-level context for understanding health across production animals. Within that framework, reproduction connects with nutrition, genetics, environmental stress, infectious and noninfectious disease, animal development, and overall physiological function.
​
This relationship is especially apparent during pregnancy and the neonatal period. Successful reproduction does not end at conception. Pregnancy establishment, fetal development, parturition, neonatal adaptation, and offspring survival are all components of a productive reproductive cycle. Maternal condition and environmental circumstances can influence developmental outcomes beyond birth and may affect reproductive function later in life.
​
Reproductive management also interacts with genetics. Selection decisions influence the genetic potential for fertility, while reproductive technologies determine how efficiently that genetic potential can be disseminated. Similarly, nutritional status and environmental stress can influence whether an animal realizes its underlying reproductive capacity.
​
The result is a systems-level perspective: livestock fertility is neither exclusively a reproductive-organ problem nor solely a breeding-management issue. It results from interactions between biological systems and the production environment.
​
Key Concept Within This Pillar: Reproductive Efficiency Is Multifactorial
A central concept in livestock reproduction is that fertility is multifactorial.
​
No single reproductive measure or biological mechanism fully explains fertility across livestock species. Reproductive success emerges from interactions among genetics, endocrine function, gamete quality, nutrition, environmental conditions, maternal factors, stress physiology, reproductive management, and, potentially, microbial communities.
​
Species differences reinforce this principle. Cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and poultry have distinct reproductive cycles, seasonal patterns, reproductive anatomy, and production objectives. Consequently, reproductive traits and the factors associated with fertility must be interpreted within the biological context of each species.
​
This multifactorial model also explains why modern reproductive research increasingly draws on multiple disciplines. Genomic studies can identify genetic associations with reproductive traits; transcriptomic and proteomic studies can investigate biological mechanisms; metabolomics can identify candidate biomarkers; reproductive physiology can explain endocrine and cellular processes; and precision livestock technologies can provide real-time information about animal behavior and reproductive events (Long, 2020; Aponte et al., 2025).
​
Understanding fertility in this way also helps explain why reproductive management is increasingly moving toward integrated approaches. Rather than treating conception as an isolated endpoint, researchers are examining the entire reproductive pathway—from gamete development and breeding through embryo survival, pregnancy establishment, maternal health, and offspring development.
​
Maternal and Neonatal Health
Maternal and neonatal health represents the first major extension of reproductive health beyond conception. A successful reproductive cycle depends not only on fertilization but also on pregnancy establishment, fetal development, successful parturition, neonatal adaptation, and offspring survival.
​
Pregnancy is a particularly complex stage because the developing conceptus must establish and maintain communication with the maternal reproductive system. Research on pregnancy establishment has increasingly focused on the signals produced by the conceptus and the maternal responses that allow pregnancy to be maintained. Early pregnancy is therefore recognized as a period when substantial reproductive loss can occur, making it an important component of overall reproductive efficiency (Ott et al., 2024; Spencer, 2013).
Maternal condition is also connected with reproductive outcomes. Nutrition and body condition can influence reproductive physiology before and during pregnancy, while environmental stressors can alter endocrine function. Maternal influences may also extend into the next generation. Developmental programming research indicates that nutritional status, maternal body condition, thermal conditions, and other prenatal or early-life exposures can influence reproductive development in female offspring (Akbarinejad & Cushman, 2024).
​
Environmental heat is one factor that can affect both reproductive performance and offspring-related outcomes. In sheep, heat stress has been associated with impaired reproductive function in ewes and rams, with sensitive periods occurring around estrus and effects on reproductive processes extending beyond the immediate period of heat exposure (Van Wettere et al., 2021). More broadly, stress-related endocrine changes can interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and affect reproductive function in sheep and goats (Tada et al., 2025).
​
Neonatal health is the next critical transition. Birth requires successful adaptation from the intrauterine environment to independent life, and neonatal survival ultimately determines whether successful conception and pregnancy translate into a viable addition to the herd or flock. Thus, maternal and neonatal health forms a continuum with reproduction rather than a separate subject.
​
The maternal-neonatal relationship also affects long-term productivity. Conditions during fetal and early postnatal development can influence later physiological characteristics, including reproductive potential. This makes developmental programming an increasingly important research theme within livestock reproduction.
​
The Maternal and Neonatal Health minor pillar examines this continuum in greater depth, including pregnancy establishment, maternal influences on fetal development, parturition, neonatal adaptation, and the developmental foundations of future reproductive health.
​
Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer
Artificial insemination (AI) and embryo transfer (ET) are among the most established assisted reproductive technologies in livestock production. Rather than relying exclusively on natural mating, these technologies allow reproductive material from genetically selected animals to be used across larger populations and, in some circumstances, enable reproductive processes to be managed with greater precision. Their importance extends beyond conception itself because reproductive biotechnology can influence the rate at which desirable genetics are disseminated through a herd or flock.
​
Artificial insemination separates semen collection and delivery from natural mating. This allows semen from selected males to be distributed among multiple females and has made AI an important component of genetic improvement programs, particularly in cattle. Contemporary reproductive programs may combine AI with estrous synchronization, fixed-time AI, semen evaluation, sexed semen, and other technologies. Precision livestock systems are also increasingly being investigated for detection of reproductive events and decision support (Koujalagi et al., 2026).
​
The biological quality of semen is a major consideration. Conventional semen assessment can include characteristics such as sperm concentration, motility, morphology, and viability, while newer approaches investigate sperm DNA integrity, molecular markers, and other measures of functional competence. Research into sperm quality has expanded because conventional semen characteristics do not necessarily capture every aspect of the sperm's capacity to support fertilization and embryo development (Hassanine et al., 2026; Ribas-Maynou et al., 2023).
​
Sperm DNA fragmentation is one emerging area of investigation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of farm animals has examined associations between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility-related parameters, reflecting broader interest in identifying male fertility biomarkers that may complement conventional semen analysis (Abah et al., 2025). Omics technologies are similarly being investigated as a way of identifying molecular characteristics associated with male reproductive performance (Long, 2020).
​
Embryo transfer takes reproductive biotechnology a step further. Instead of transferring sperm alone, embryos produced from genetically selected parents can be transferred to recipient females. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer, in vitro embryo production, in vitro fertilization, and related approaches can therefore increase the reproductive contribution of selected females while facilitating the movement and dissemination of desirable genetics.
​
Recipient management is an important component of embryo-transfer outcomes because embryo development and transfer do not occur independently of the maternal reproductive environment. Research examining assisted reproductive technologies in cattle and sheep has therefore emphasized the relationship between embryo quality, recipient characteristics, reproductive synchrony, and pregnancy outcomes (Daly et al., 2020).
​
In cattle, assisted reproductive technologies have become comparatively advanced. Current approaches include AI, multiple ovulation embryo transfer, oocyte pickup and in vitro embryo production, embryo grading, and IVF-related techniques. Comparative research has also examined cattle produced through AI, multiple ovulation embryo transfer, and in vitro fertilization to understand whether reproductive origin is associated with subsequent production and fertility traits (Lafontaine et al., 2023).
​
The availability and maturity of these technologies vary among livestock species. Reproductive biotechnology is relatively well established in cattle, while some technologies remain less developed or less consistently applied in species such as camels and other livestock. Comparative genomics and reproductive research are consequently investigating how species-specific reproductive mechanisms may affect the application of assisted reproduction (Mohteshamuddin et al., 2026).
​
Pregnancy establishment remains a critical endpoint for assisted reproductive technologies. Producing or transferring an embryo does not guarantee successful pregnancy. The conceptus must establish appropriate communication with the maternal reproductive system, and pregnancy must subsequently be maintained. Research into pregnancy diagnosis increasingly examines conceptus-derived tissues, fluids, and maternal responses as potential sources of information about pregnancy status (Ott et al., 2024).
​
The Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer minor pillar explores these technologies in greater depth, including their biological foundations, reproductive applications, fertility assessment, embryo technologies, and emerging developments in assisted reproduction.
​
Reproductive Nutrition and Genetics
Nutrition and genetics represent two interconnected foundations of livestock reproductive performance. Nutritional status influences the physiological environment in which reproduction occurs, while genetic variation contributes to differences in reproductive capacity among animals. Together, these factors help explain why reproductive efficiency cannot be understood solely through breeding technology or reproductive anatomy.
​
Nutrition affects reproduction through multiple biological pathways. Energy availability, metabolic status, body condition, and nutrient supply can influence reproductive physiology in ruminants. Nutritional signals interact with endocrine pathways involved in follicular development, ovulation, ovarian function, and reproductive cyclicity. Consequently, reproduction reflects not only the reproductive organs themselves but also the animal's broader metabolic state (Robinson et al., 2006; Kang et al., 2026).
​
The relationship between nutrition and fertility is particularly important because reproductive demands occur within the context of competing physiological requirements. In production animals, the allocation of nutrients among maintenance, growth, lactation, reproduction, and other biological processes can influence reproductive performance. Modern research is increasingly focused on the molecular mechanisms through which nutritional status communicates with the reproductive axis rather than treating nutrition as an isolated input (Kang et al., 2026).
​
Genetics adds another dimension. Fertility is a complex trait influenced by multiple genes and biological pathways rather than a single genetic determinant. Genome-wide association studies and other genomic approaches have identified candidate loci associated with reproductive traits in cattle, pigs, poultry, goats, and other livestock. These investigations are helping clarify the biological architecture of fertility and identify potential markers for genetic evaluation (Liang et al., 2023; Khan & Khezri, 2024).
​
In cattle, genes and pathways involving follicle-stimulating hormone signaling, luteinizing hormone signaling, insulin-like growth factor pathways, leptin signaling, and ovarian growth factors have been investigated in relation to fertility. Candidate genes including FSHR, LHCGR, IGF1, LEP/LEPR, BMP15, and GDF9 have received attention across genomic and functional studies (Mohteshamuddin et al., 2026).
Male fertility is receiving increasing attention within this genetic framework. Historically, reproductive research and selection programs have often emphasized female reproductive performance, even though successful reproduction depends on contributions from both sexes. Genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and other omics approaches are now being used to investigate molecular characteristics associated with sperm quality and male fertility (Long, 2020; Khan et al., 2024).
​
Genetic improvement therefore involves a balance between reproductive traits and other economically important characteristics. Dairy cattle illustrate this challenge. Selection for production traits has historically been associated with unfavorable fertility trends, while more recent genomic selection has created opportunities to incorporate fertility more effectively into breeding objectives. Reproductive success and genetic improvement are consequently interdependent: reproduction determines whether genetic progress can be transmitted, while selection determines the genetic composition of future reproductive populations (Strabel & Colebjohn, 2026).
​
The field is also moving toward precision fertility prediction. Genomic information can be combined with transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic measurements to identify biological signatures associated with reproductive phenotypes. For example, research has investigated seminal-plasma proteins, sperm-associated molecular characteristics, and metabolites as potential biomarkers of fertility or reproductive competence (Aponte et al., 2025; Long, 2020).
​
The Reproductive Nutrition and Genetics minor pillar examines these relationships in greater detail, including nutritional regulation of reproductive physiology, fertility-associated genetic variation, genomic selection, male fertility, and emerging precision-breeding approaches.
​
Current Research Themes
Contemporary livestock reproductive research evaluates fertility as an integrated, multi-system phenotype, bridging molecular biology, precision management, and environmental physiology.
​
Omics-Based Fertility Prediction
Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related technologies are being investigated to identify biomarkers associated with reproductive performance. These approaches may help explain why animals with apparently similar conventional reproductive characteristics can differ in fertility and may eventually improve the biological precision of reproductive evaluation (Long, 2020; Aponte et al., 2025).
​
Male Fertility and Sperm Quality
Research is expanding beyond conventional semen measurements toward sperm DNA integrity, molecular markers, seminal-plasma proteins, and functional characteristics. The objective is to develop a more complete understanding of the paternal contribution to fertility and improve prediction of reproductive potential (Abah et al., 2025; Hassanine et al., 2026).
​
Climate and Reproductive Resilience
Heat stress and other climate-related environmental pressures are major areas of reproductive research. In sheep, heat exposure can affect estrous expression, fertilization, embryo survival, and male reproductive function. Research is increasingly concerned not only with immediate reproductive effects but also with broader climate-related consequences for reproductive biology (Van Wettere et al., 2021; Park et al., 2026).
​
Developmental Programming
Research into developmental programming examines how prenatal and early-life environments may influence reproductive function later in life. Maternal nutrition, body condition, environmental stress, and other exposures may influence developmental trajectories through physiological and epigenetic mechanisms (Akbarinejad & Cushman, 2024; Wathes, 2022).
​
Reproductive Microbiomes
The reproductive microbiome is an emerging field investigating how microbial communities associated with reproductive tissues may interact with host physiology. Unlike the lower-abundance human uterine environment, livestock reproductive tracts naturally host complex resident microbial communities where reproductive success depends on maintaining mucosal immune homeostasis rather than sterility, preventing dysbiosis-induced uterine inflammation (Poole et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2026).
​
Precision Livestock Reproduction
Sensor-based estrus detection, automated monitoring, data analytics, and decision-support technologies are increasingly being incorporated into reproductive systems. These technologies aim to improve the timing and accuracy of reproductive observations while integrating behavioral and physiological data into breeding decisions (Koujalagi et al., 2026).
​
Genetics and Precision Breeding
Genomic selection continues to reshape livestock breeding by allowing fertility-associated genetic information to be incorporated alongside production traits. Research is also investigating more advanced reproductive and genetic technologies, including genome editing. Their broader application remains dependent on reliable fertility phenotypes, appropriate evaluation methods, biological understanding, and wider acceptance (Strabel & Colebjohn, 2026; Zamani et al., 2023).
​
Frequently Asked Questions
What is livestock reproduction and fertility?
Livestock reproduction refers to the biological processes through which animals produce offspring, while fertility describes the capacity to reproduce successfully. In production systems, reproductive performance encompasses outcomes such as conception, pregnancy establishment, offspring production, and reproductive efficiency.
Why is fertility important in livestock production?
Fertility affects the number and timing of offspring produced and therefore influences production efficiency, replacement populations, and genetic progress. Reproductive performance also determines how effectively selected genetic traits can be transmitted to subsequent generations.
What factors affect livestock fertility?
Fertility is multifactorial. Genetic background, reproductive physiology, gamete quality, nutrition, body condition, environmental conditions, stress, maternal factors, reproductive management, and potentially reproductive microbiomes can all contribute to reproductive outcomes.
How does nutrition affect reproductive performance?
Nutritional status influences metabolic and endocrine pathways involved in reproductive physiology. Energy balance and nutrient availability can affect reproductive function, particularly in ruminants. Current research increasingly examines the molecular mechanisms linking nutritional status with the reproductive axis (Kang et al., 2026).
What is artificial insemination in livestock?
Artificial insemination is an assisted reproductive technology in which semen is introduced into the female reproductive tract without natural mating. It can facilitate the wider dissemination of genetics from selected males and is an established reproductive technology in several livestock industries.
What is embryo transfer?
Embryo transfer involves moving an embryo from a donor female into a recipient female. It can increase the reproductive contribution of genetically valuable females and is part of a broader group of assisted reproductive technologies used in livestock breeding.
Why is male fertility important?
Successful reproduction requires both male and female contributions. Sperm concentration, motility, morphology, viability, DNA integrity, and other functional characteristics can influence reproductive outcomes. Research increasingly examines molecular biomarkers to improve understanding of male fertility (Abah et al., 2025).
Does heat stress affect livestock reproduction?
Yes. Research indicates that heat stress can disrupt reproductive processes in several livestock species. In sheep, for example, heat exposure has been associated with effects on estrus, fertilization, embryo survival, and male reproductive function (Van Wettere et al., 2021).
Why does livestock fertility differ between species?
​
Different livestock species have distinct reproductive anatomy, physiology, endocrine regulation, breeding seasons, reproductive cycles, and production objectives. Consequently, fertility should always be interpreted within the biological context of the species being considered.
​
Explore Related Topics
Reproduction & Fertility connects with several other areas of the Livestock Health Overview system. Readers can explore related topics through the following child pillars:
​
-
Livestock Health Overview
-
Nutritional and Environmental Influences on Fertility
-
Maternal and Neonatal Health
-
Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer
-
Reproductive Nutrition and Genetics
Written by Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM
Disclaimer
This content is intended for educational purposes only and reflects current veterinary understanding of reproduction and fertility in livestock. It does not replace professional veterinary evaluation, diagnosis, or herd-specific reproductive management guidance.
References
-
Abah, K. O., Ligocka-Kowalczyk, Z., Itodo, J. I., Ameh, G., Partyka, A., & Niżański, W. (2025). Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility parameters in farm animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Veterinary Research, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04652-9
-
Akbarinejad, V., & Cushman, R. A. (2024). Developmental programming of reproduction in the female animal. Animal Reproduction Science, 263, 107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107456
-
Aponte, P. M., Gutierrez-Reinoso, M., & García-Herreros, M. (2025). Editorial: Exploring ‘omic’ biomarkers in animal production and reproduction. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1688780
-
Daly, J., Smith, H., McGrice, H., Kind, K., & Van Wettere, W. (2020). Towards improving the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies of cattle and sheep, with particular focus on recipient management. Animals, 10, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020293
-
Hassanine, N. N. A. M., Ibrahim, N., Basher, N. S., Saleh, A. A., Elnesr, S., Essa, M. O. A., Husien, H. M., & Wang, M. (2026). A comparative review of fertility and semen assessment techniques in farm animals. Animals, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050854
-
Kang, T.-C., Fan, G.-J., Lin, H.-H., Tseng, K.-F., Liu, Y.-C., & Wu, H.-H. (2026). Nutritional regulation of reproductive physiology in ruminants: A mechanistic review. Life, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16040630
-
Khan, H., & Khezri, A. (2024). Editorial: Regulation of fertility in livestock species. Frontiers in Genetics, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1404237
-
Khan, M., Chen, W., Naz, S., Liu, X., Liang, H., Chen, Y., Kou, X., Liu, Y., Ashraf, I., Han, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, C., & Zahoor, M. (2024). Determinant genetic markers of semen quality in livestock. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1456305
-
Koujalagi, S. C., Choudhary, J., Nikam, V. D., Azad, M. S., Singh, D., Mahanthesh, M., Chennakadan, N. J., & Yadav, R. (2026). Boosting reproductive efficiency in livestock: Management strategies and approaches. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i54158
-
Lafontaine, S., Labrecque, R., Blondin, P., Cue, R., & Sirard, M. (2023). Comparison of cattle derived from in vitro fertilization, multiple ovulation embryo transfer, and artificial insemination for milk production and fertility traits. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22736
-
Liang, A., Zhou, Y., Riaz, H., & Davis, J. S. (2023). Editorial: Genetic analysis of reproductive traits in livestock. Frontiers in Genetics, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1116038
-
Long, J. (2020). The ‘omics’ revolution: Use of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic tools to predict male reproductive traits that impact fertility in livestock and poultry. Animal Reproduction Science, 106354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106354
-
Mohteshamuddin, K., Nizamuddin, A., & Bijurkar, R. G. (2026). Comparative genomics and reproductive mechanisms of fertility in cattle and camels: Implications for assisted reproduction and precision breeding. Animal Reproduction Science, 292, 108281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2026.108281
-
Ott, T., Tibary, A., Waqas, M., Geisert, R. D., & Giordano, J. O. (2024). Pregnancy establishment and diagnosis in livestock. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021022-032214
-
Park, J., Kim, S., Song, J., & Lim, W. (2026). Toxicological implications of climate change for reproductive function in livestock. Molecular & Cellular Toxicology, 22, 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-026-00639-1
-
Poole, R., Soffa, D., McAnally, B., Smith, M. S., Hickman-Brown, K. J., & Stockland, E. L. (2023). Reproductive microbiomes in domestic livestock: Insights utilizing 16S rRNA gene amplicon community sequencing. Animals, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030485
-
Ribas-Maynou, J., Barranco, I., & Salas-Huetos, A. (2023). Sperm quality and fertility of livestock animals. Animals, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040604
-
Robinson, J., Ashworth, C., Rooke, J., Mitchell, L. M., & McEvoy, T. (2006). Nutrition and fertility in ruminant livestock. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 126, 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.006
-
Spencer, T. (2013). Early pregnancy: Concepts, challenges, and potential solutions. Animal Frontiers, 3, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0033
-
Strabel, T., & Colebjohn, J. B. (2026). Reproduction and genetic improvement in dairy cattle: Sustaining a critical link in the era of opportunities. Livestock Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2026.105896
-
Tada, O., Tshabuse, P. M., Mamakoko, M. S., & Mashamaite, P. (2025). Evaluation of stress hormones on reproductive functions of sheep and goats: A systematic review. Frontiers in Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1611896
-
Van Wettere, W., Kind, K., Gatford, K. L., Swinbourne, A., Leu, S., Hayman, P., Kelly, J., Weaver, A., Kleemann, D., & Walker, S. (2021). Review of the impact of heat stress on reproductive performance of sheep. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00537-z
-
Wathes, D. (2022). Developmental programming of fertility in cattle—Is it a cause for concern? Animals, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192654
-
Zamani, P., Abdoli, R., Ferdosi, M., & Eghbalsaied, S. (2023). Editorial: Genetics of reproduction for livestock species. Frontiers in Genetics, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1210904
-
Zhou, X., Cao, J., Feng, G., Li, Y., Liu, D., & Liu, G. (2026). Commensal microbiota and reproductive health in livestock: Mechanisms, cross-system crosstalk, and precision strategies. Animals, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030371