top of page

Growth and Productivity in Livestock

Growth and productivity are central themes in modern livestock production. Across cattle, sheep, goats, swine, poultry, and other food-producing species, livestock systems aim to convert available resources into animal products while maintaining biological performance, economic viability, and long-term sustainability. Advances in genetics, nutrition, reproductive management, and data-driven technologies have substantially increased livestock productivity over the past several decades, helping meet growing global demand for meat, milk, eggs, and other animal-derived products (Thornton, 2010).

​

At the same time, livestock productivity is increasingly viewed through a broader lens than simple output. Researchers now evaluate growth, feed utilization, resource efficiency, environmental impact, and system resilience together. This integrated perspective recognizes that maximizing production alone does not necessarily optimize overall system performance (Moorby & Fraser, 2021; Chandrakar et al., 2026).

Within livestock health systems, growth and productivity represent the interaction of biological development, nutritional management, genetics, management practices, and production efficiency. Understanding these relationships helps explain why some animals achieve superior performance and why certain production systems are more efficient than others.

​

What This Major Pillar Covers

 

This major pillar explores the science of growth and productivity in livestock. It examines how animals develop from conception through maturity, how nutrition influences production outcomes, and how productivity and efficiency are measured at animal, farm, and system levels.

​

The pillar introduces three interconnected areas:

​

  • Growth and Development in Livestock

  • Nutritional Management for Production

  • Production Efficiency Metrics

 

Together, these topics provide a framework for understanding livestock performance across diverse production systems.

​

Why This Area Matters

 

Livestock production contributes substantially to global food systems and rural economies. As demand for animal-derived foods continues to increase, producers and researchers face the challenge of improving productivity while managing resource use and environmental impacts (Thornton, 2010).

​

Growth performance influences the efficiency with which animals convert nutrients into muscle, milk, eggs, fiber, or offspring. Nutritional management affects both biological performance and production costs, with feed commonly representing the largest single expense in livestock enterprises (Greenwood, 2021; Kadim et al., 2025). Efficiency metrics help determine whether production gains are achieved through improved biological conversion, better resource utilization, or more effective management practices.

​

The importance of this field extends beyond individual farms. Productivity influences food security, resource allocation, environmental sustainability, and the capacity of livestock systems to meet future demands (Begna & Masho, 2024; Thornton, 2010).

​

How This Major Pillar Relates to Livestock Health

 

Growth and productivity are closely connected to livestock health. Healthy animals generally exhibit better growth rates, reproductive performance, feed utilization, and production outcomes. Likewise, developmental processes, nutritional status, and management practices influence physiological function throughout life.

​

Growth begins before birth. Research on developmental programming demonstrates that prenatal nutrition and maternal environment can affect muscle development, metabolism, growth potential, and production efficiency later in life (Zhao et al., 2023). Postnatal nutrition continues to influence physiological development and productive performance across species.

​

As animals mature, health, nutrition, and management interact to determine productivity. Modern livestock systems increasingly use data collection, precision feeding, reproductive technologies, and performance monitoring to improve outcomes while supporting animal welfare and resource efficiency (Tedeschi et al., 2025; Vlaicu et al., 2024).

​

Because growth, health, reproduction, and production are interconnected, productivity cannot be fully understood without considering the biological processes that support animal performance.

​

Key Concepts Within This Pillar

 

Several foundational concepts appear throughout the scientific literature on livestock growth and productivity:

​

Growth Biology

 

Growth involves the accumulation of muscle, fat, bone, and other tissues throughout development. Body weight is commonly used to evaluate growth, but researchers increasingly recognize that body composition and carcass characteristics provide more meaningful indicators of productive performance (Owens et al., 1995).

​

Nutritional Management

​

Nutrition supplies the energy and nutrients required for growth, reproduction, maintenance, and production. Feed quality, nutrient balance, feeding strategies, and feed utilization strongly influence livestock productivity (Kadim et al., 2025).

​

Feed Efficiency

 

Feed efficiency describes how effectively animals convert feed resources into productive outputs. Improving feed efficiency remains one of the most important goals in animal agriculture because feed costs often account for the majority of production expenses (Greenwood, 2021).

​

Developmental Programming

 

Developmental programming refers to the long-term effects of early-life conditions on later performance. Nutritional conditions during gestation and early growth can influence muscle development, metabolism, reproductive performance, and productivity throughout life (Zhao et al., 2023).

​

Precision Livestock Farming

 

Precision livestock farming uses sensors, data analytics, artificial intelligence, and automated monitoring systems to improve decision-making and production efficiency (Tedeschi et al., 2025).

​

Sustainability and Resource Efficiency

 

Modern productivity assessments increasingly include resource use, nutrient efficiency, land utilization, and environmental impacts alongside traditional production metrics (Moorby & Fraser, 2021).

​

Growth and Development in Livestock

 

Growth is a complex biological process that determines how animals convert nutrients into body tissues throughout life. In livestock production, growth influences production efficiency, market value, reproductive performance, and overall productivity.

​

Historically, growth has often been measured through changes in live body weight. However, research demonstrates that weight gain alone provides an incomplete picture of development because growth consists of varying proportions of muscle, fat, bone, and organ tissue accumulation (Owens et al., 1995). Two animals with identical weight gains may differ substantially in body composition and production value.

​

Development begins before birth. Prenatal growth establishes many of the physiological foundations that influence later productivity. Nutritional conditions during gestation affect fetal tissue development, metabolic programming, and future production potential. Studies of developmental programming indicate that inadequate maternal nutrition can alter muscle growth, metabolic efficiency, and subsequent production performance (Zhao et al., 2023).

​

Genetic factors also play an important role in growth. Selective breeding programs have dramatically improved growth performance in many livestock species over recent decades. Lean tissue deposition, growth rate, and feed conversion traits have all benefited from sustained genetic improvement efforts, particularly in swine and poultry production systems (Brameld & Parr, 2016).

​

At the molecular level, insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) has emerged as a key regulator of prenatal and early postnatal development. Research identifies IGF2 as an important contributor to muscle development, metabolic regulation, growth performance, and feed efficiency across multiple livestock species (Ayuti et al., 2026).

​

However, growth improvement is not without trade-offs. Efforts to increase lean growth rates can influence carcass characteristics and meat quality. Research has documented associations between rapid muscle growth and reduced intramuscular fat deposition, as well as increased susceptibility to certain muscle abnormalities in some production systems (Zhao et al., 2023).

​

Modern livestock management therefore seeks to balance growth performance with product quality, reproductive function, animal health, and resource efficiency.

​

Learn more in our guide to Growth and Development in Livestock.

​

Nutritional Management for Production

 

Nutrition is one of the most influential factors affecting livestock growth, productivity, reproductive performance, and production efficiency. Across species and production systems, nutrient supply directly influences the ability of animals to express their genetic potential for growth and production. As a result, nutritional management is consistently identified as one of the strongest drivers of livestock performance (Kadim et al., 2025; Koujalagi et al., 2026).

​

The importance of nutrition extends beyond biological outcomes. Feed commonly represents approximately 60%–70% of total production costs in many livestock enterprises, making feed management a major determinant of economic performance (Greenwood, 2021; Begna & Masho, 2024). Even modest improvements in feed utilization can significantly affect overall production efficiency.

​

Balanced nutrition requires the appropriate provision of energy, protein, vitamins, minerals, and water. These nutrients support tissue growth, maintenance, reproduction, immune function, and product formation. Deficiencies, imbalances, or inefficient utilization of nutrients can limit growth performance and productive outcomes (Kadim et al., 2025).

​

Research increasingly emphasizes that nutritional requirements vary according to species, breed, age, physiological status, production goals, and environmental conditions. Consequently, feeding programs are moving away from generalized standards toward more individualized and context-specific nutritional strategies (Temiloluwa et al., 2025). Evidence from comparative feeding studies suggests that species-specific and production-specific nutritional approaches can improve average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and reproductive outcomes compared with standardized feeding systems (Temiloluwa et al., 2025).

​

Early-life nutrition is particularly important because nutritional conditions during gestation and postnatal development can have lasting effects on growth and productivity. Developmental programming research demonstrates that nutrient supply during critical developmental periods influences muscle formation, metabolic pathways, and later production performance (Zhao et al., 2023). Similar observations have been reported in studies examining maternal nutrition and fetal development in livestock production systems (Greenwood et al., 2017).

​

Advances in feed formulation have also expanded opportunities to improve productivity. Modern feed strategies increasingly focus on optimizing nutrient density, digestibility, and nutrient synchronization—such as balancing rumen-degradable protein and energy in ruminants or refining amino acid profiles in monogastrics—to maximize biological utilization while minimizing waste (Rajeev et al., 2025; Vithalrao et al., 2025). These approaches seek to improve feed conversion efficiency while supporting animal performance.

​

Precision livestock nutrition represents one of the fastest-growing areas of research. Precision feeding systems use sensors, predictive models, growth curves, and automated technologies to match nutrient delivery more closely to animal requirements (Halas & Dukhta, 2020; Koujalagi et al., 2026). By reducing overfeeding and underfeeding, these systems may improve nutrient utilization and decrease nutrient losses to the environment.

​

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automated monitoring technologies are increasingly incorporated into feeding programs. These tools allow producers and researchers to collect large amounts of production data and adjust management practices in response to changing animal needs (Tedeschi et al., 2025; Chandrakar et al., 2026).

​

The scientific literature consistently supports the view that nutritional management is not simply about supplying feed. Rather, it involves aligning nutrient delivery with biological requirements, production objectives, economic considerations, and sustainability goals.

​

Learn more in our guide to Nutritional Management for Production.

​

Production Efficiency Metrics

 

Productivity and efficiency are often discussed together, but they represent different concepts. Productivity generally refers to the quantity of output generated, whereas efficiency describes how effectively resources are converted into those outputs.

​

Historically, livestock efficiency was often evaluated using simple measures such as growth rate, milk yield, egg production, or feed conversion ratio. While these metrics remain valuable, modern livestock science increasingly recognizes that efficiency must be assessed across multiple biological, economic, and environmental dimensions (Moorby & Fraser, 2021; Faverdin, 2017).

​

Feed conversion efficiency remains one of the most widely used measures of livestock performance. This metric evaluates how effectively animals convert feed into saleable products such as body weight gain, milk, or eggs. Improved feed conversion generally reduces production costs and resource requirements (Kenny et al., 2018; Smith & Gentry, 2023).

​

However, feed conversion alone does not capture the full complexity of livestock systems. Researchers increasingly use broader measures that account for nutrient utilization, environmental impacts, and resource efficiency.

​

Common Livestock Production Efficiency Metrics

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

​

​

​

​

Adapted from concepts discussed by Moorby and Fraser (2021) and Brameld and Parr (2016).

​

Nitrogen use efficiency has become increasingly important because inefficient protein utilization contributes to nutrient losses within livestock systems. Improving nitrogen efficiency may simultaneously support productivity and reduce environmental impacts (Broderick, 2017; Pereyra-Goday et al., 2025).

​

Land use efficiency is another critical metric, particularly in discussions surrounding global food security and sustainable livestock production. Researchers increasingly evaluate livestock systems according to the amount of food produced relative to land resources utilized (Zanten et al., 2016; Herrero et al., 2013).

​

Environmental metrics such as emission intensity provide additional perspectives on efficiency. These measures examine greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental outputs relative to productive performance, helping researchers evaluate trade-offs between production gains and environmental impacts (Herrero et al., 2013).

​

Another emerging concept is human-edible protein efficiency. This metric compares edible animal protein outputs with human-edible feed inputs, helping assess the role of livestock in broader food systems (Wilkinson, 2011; Brameld & Parr, 2016).

​

The literature increasingly emphasizes that no single metric fully captures livestock productivity. Instead, efficiency is best evaluated using integrated biological, economic, and environmental measures that reflect the complexity of modern livestock systems (Glazier, 2025; Theodoridis & Melfou, 2025).

​

Learn more in our guide to Production Efficiency Metrics.

​

Current Research Themes

 

Several research areas are shaping the future understanding of growth and productivity in livestock.

​

Precision Livestock Farming

 

Precision livestock farming combines sensors, automation, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics to support data-driven management decisions. These technologies enable real-time monitoring of growth, feed intake, reproductive status, and production performance (Tedeschi et al., 2025; Vlaicu et al., 2024).

​

Developmental Programming

 

Researchers continue to investigate how prenatal and early-life environments influence long-term growth trajectories, productivity, and metabolic efficiency. This field has become increasingly important for understanding variation in livestock performance (Zhao et al., 2023; Ayuti et al., 2026).

​

Feed Efficiency Biology

 

Feed efficiency remains a major area of investigation. Studies increasingly examine genetic, metabolic, and physiological factors that explain why some animals convert feed more efficiently than others (Kenny et al., 2018; Rauw et al., 2024).

​

Omics and Biotechnology

 

Genomics, metabolomics, and other omics technologies are being used to identify biological pathways associated with growth performance, feed efficiency, and reproductive success (Nunes et al., 2024; Wadood et al., 2025).

​

Sustainable Production Systems

 

Researchers increasingly evaluate livestock productivity within broader environmental and food-system contexts. Current work examines resource efficiency, resilience, emissions, and sustainable intensification strategies (Wu et al., 2022; Khanal et al., 2022).

​

Frequently Asked Questions

 

What is livestock productivity?

​

Livestock productivity refers to the amount of output generated by animals or livestock systems over a given period. Outputs may include body weight gain, milk production, egg production, offspring, fiber, or meat yield. Modern definitions increasingly incorporate biological, economic, and environmental dimensions rather than focusing solely on production volume (Thornton, 2010; Theodoridis & Melfou, 2025).

 

What factors influence livestock growth?

​

Livestock growth is influenced by genetics, nutrition, prenatal development, health status, management practices, environmental conditions, and reproductive factors. Growth outcomes result from interactions among these factors throughout the animal's life cycle (Owens et al., 1995; Ayuti et al., 2026).

 

Why is nutrition important for livestock productivity?

​

Nutrition provides the energy and nutrients necessary for growth, maintenance, reproduction, and production. Feed quality, nutrient balance, and feeding strategies directly influence productive performance and resource utilization. Because feed often represents the largest production expense, nutritional management plays a major role in both biological and economic outcomes (Greenwood, 2021; Kadim et al., 2025).

 

What is feed efficiency?

​

Feed efficiency describes how effectively livestock convert feed resources into productive outputs. Depending on the production system, outputs may include weight gain, milk, eggs, or other products. Feed efficiency is widely used as a key indicator of biological performance and resource utilization (Kenny et al., 2018; Smith & Gentry, 2023).

​

Why are efficiency metrics becoming more complex?

 

Researchers increasingly recognize that livestock systems affect not only production but also resource use, nutrient cycling, land requirements, and environmental outcomes. As a result, efficiency assessments now include measures such as nitrogen use efficiency, land use efficiency, emission intensity, and human-edible protein efficiency alongside traditional production metrics (Moorby & Fraser, 2021; Wilkinson, 2011).

 

What is precision livestock farming?

​

Precision livestock farming refers to the use of digital technologies, sensors, automation, artificial intelligence, and data analytics to monitor animals and optimize management decisions. These systems support more precise approaches to feeding, growth monitoring, reproduction, and production management (Tedeschi et al., 2025; Vlaicu et al., 2024).

​

Explore Related Topics

 

This major pillar is part of the broader Livestock Health knowledge system.

​

Livestock Health Overview

Growth and Development in Livestock

Nutritional Management for Production

Production Efficiency Metrics

Metric

Typical Unit

Scale

Why It Matters

Feed conversion efficiency

kg feed DM/kg product

Individual animal

Evaluates biological conversion of feed into productive output

Nitrogen use efficiency

kg nitrogen in product/kg feed nitrogen

Individual animal

Reflects protein utilization and nutrient losses

Land use efficiency

kg product/hectare

Farm to global

Measures productivity relative to land resources

Emission intensity

g emissions/kg product

Animal to system

Links productivity with environmental burden

Human-edible protein efficiency

kg edible protein output/kg edible protein input

Animal or farm

Assesses competition between livestock feed and human food resources

Written by Athena  Angela Gaffud, DVM

 

Disclaimer

This content is intended for general educational purposes only and is informed by established veterinary research and consensus. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. For concerns about an individual animals’s health or well-being, consult a licensed veterinarian.

References

  • Ayuti, S. R., Kim, E. J., Shin, S., Lamid, M., Lokapirnasari, W., Arif, M. A. A., Warsito, S. H., Rosyada, Z., Khairullah, A. R., Ferasyi, T. R., Sabri, M., Rimayanti, R., Wasito, W., & Ahmad, R. (2026). Insulin-like growth factor 2 as a central regulator of growth and metabolic efficiency in livestock: Genetic, nutritional, and biotechnological perspectives. Veterinary World, 19, 1417–1436. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2026.1417-1436

  • Barış, A. (2023). Impact of feed quality on livestock productivity. Journal of Livestock Policy. https://doi.org/10.47604/jlp.v2i1.2112

  • Begna, R., & Masho, W. (2024). Valuation of livestock population and national feed security to enhance livestock productivity in Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1415

  • Brameld, J., & Parr, T. (2016). Improving efficiency in meat production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 75, 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000161

  • Broderick, G. A. (2017). Review: Optimizing ruminant conversion of feed protein to human food protein. Animal, 12(S2), 1722–1734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117002592

  • Chandrakar, P., Yadav, R., Garg, D., Kumar, D., & Gupta, A. (2026). Modern livestock production management strategies for resource-efficient animal agriculture: A review. Archives of Current Research International. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2026/v26i21752

  • Faverdin, P. (2017). How to assess efficiency in animal production : different approaches from animal to farming systems.

  • Glazier, D. S. (2025). Holistic system analysis of the energetic power and efficiency of animal production. BioSystems, 252, 105470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105470

  • Greenwood, P. L. (2021). Review: An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Animal, 100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295

  • Greenwood, P. L., Clayton, E. H., & Bell, A. W. (2017). Developmental programming and beef production. Animal Frontiers, 7, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017-0127

  • Halas, V., & Dukhta, G. (2020). Growth models and their application in precision feeding of monogastric farm animals. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 23, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.258-264

  • Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M., Thornton, P., Blümmel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D., & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 20888–20893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149110

  • Kadim, O. M., Alkareem, D. A., & Al-Fahham, A. (2025). Nutritional strategies to improve growth performance and feed efficiency in ruminants. International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-11-08-21

  • Kenny, D. A., Fitzsimons, C., Waters, S. M., & McGee, M. (2018). Invited review: Improving feed efficiency of beef cattle—the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal, 12(9), 1815–1826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000976

  • Khanal, P., Dhakal, R., Khanal, T., Pandey, D., Devkota, N. R., & Nielsen, M. O. (2022). Sustainable livestock production in Nepal: A focus on animal nutrition strategies. Agriculture, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050679

  • Koujalagi, S. C., Vithalrao, U. S., M. T., Garg, D., Tanpure, M. U., Bara, S., & Meena, A. (2026). Progressive advancements in nutritional strategies for enhancing livestock productivity. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i24077

  • Moorby, J. M., & Fraser, M. D. (2021). Review: New feeds and new feeding systems in intensive and semi-intensive forage-fed ruminant livestock systems. Animal, 15, 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100297

  • Neto, J. S. B., Mota, L., Londoño-Gil, M., Schmidt, P. I., Rodrigues, G. R. D., Ligori, V. A., Arikawa, L. M., Magnabosco, C., Brito, L. F., & Baldi, F. (2024). Genotype-by-environment interactions in beef and dairy cattle populations: A review of methodologies and perspectives on research and applications. Animal Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13483

  • Nunes, A. T., Faleiros, C. A., Poleti, M., Novais, F. J., López-Hernández, Y., Mandal, R., Wishart, D., & Fukumasu, H. (2024). Unraveling ruminant feed efficiency through metabolomics: A systematic review. Metabolites, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14120675

  • Owens, F. N., Gill, D. R., Secrist, D. S., & Coleman, S. W. (1995). Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 73(10), 3152–3172. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73103152x

  • Pereyra-Goday, F., Castillo, J., Rovira, P., Ayala, W., Lee, M. R. F., & Rivero, M. J. (2025). Nitrogen use efficiency in mixed crop-livestock systems: Insights for sustainable intensification. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1522557

  • Rajeev, Jawla, S. K., Singh, J. P., Yadav, B., Kumar, N., & Sahrawat, A. (2025). Innovative feed formulation strategies for optimizing growth and feed efficiency in livestock systems: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Research. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.b-5663

  • Rauw, W. M., Baumgard, L. H., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2024). Review: Feed efficiency and metabolic flexibility in livestock. Animal, 19(1), 101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101376

  • Smith, Z. K., & Gentry, W. W. (2023). Creating a more efficient production system (feed efficiency in the real world). Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad341.067

  • Tedeschi, L. O., Lopez, P., Menendez, H. M., & Seo, S. (2025). Advancing precision livestock farming: Integrating artificial intelligence and emerging technologies for sustainable livestock management. Animal Bioscience, 39. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.25.0289

  • Temiloluwa, O. J., Comfort, O. O., Abisodun, E. T., & Chinonyerem, C. A. (2025). Establishing optimal nutrient levels for improved livestock production and health: An equivalence multi-species comparison study. International Journal of Convergent and Informatics Science Research. https://doi.org/10.70382/hijcisr.v08i9.036

  • Theodoridis, A., & Melfou, K. (2025). Productivity and efficiency of agricultural and livestock systems. Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181977

  • Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2853–2867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134

  • Vithalrao, U. S., Chandrakar, P., M. T., Singh, G., S., S., Tanpure, M. U., Kumar, S., & Singh, A. K. (2025). Advances in nutritional strategies for enhancing livestock productivity: A review. Archives of Current Research International. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2025/v25i121658

  • Vlaicu, P. A., Gras, M. A., Untea, A. E., Lefter, N. A., & Rotar, M. C. (2024). Advancing livestock technology: Intelligent systemization for enhanced productivity, welfare, and sustainability. AgriEngineering, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6020084

  • Wadood, A. A., Bordbar, F., & Zhang, X. (2025). Integrating omics approaches in livestock biotechnology: Innovations in production and reproductive efficiency. Frontiers in Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1551244

  • Wilkinson, J. M. (2011). Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal, 5(7), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100005X

  • Wu, L., Harris, P., Misselbrook, T., & Lee, M. R. F. (2022). Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems. Agricultural Systems, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103307

  • Zanten, H. H. E. van, Mollenhorst, H., Klootwijk, C. W., Middelaar, C. E. van, & de Boer, I. J. M. (2016). Global food supply: Land use efficiency of livestock systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0944-1

  • Zhao, L., Liu, X., Gomez, N. A., Gao, Y., Son, J., Chae, S., Zhu, M. J., & Du, M. (2023). Stage-specific nutritional management and developmental programming to optimize meat production. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00805-0

bottom of page