Home > Systems > One Health & Public Health Overview > Disaster Preparedness & Emerging Health Threats
Disaster Preparedness & Emerging Health Threats
Disaster preparedness and emerging health threats are increasingly recognized as interconnected challenges that extend beyond traditional emergency response. Natural disasters, climate-related events, emerging infectious diseases, environmental contamination, antimicrobial resistance, and other complex hazards affect people, animals, and ecosystems at the same time. Modern preparedness therefore requires coordinated planning that recognizes these connections rather than addressing each threat in isolation.
​
Research consistently supports a One Health approach, which integrates expertise from veterinary medicine, human healthcare, environmental science, public health, agriculture, wildlife management, and emergency response. Instead of focusing solely on responding after disasters occur, current evidence emphasizes preventing risks, detecting threats earlier, strengthening surveillance, improving communication, and coordinating actions across sectors before emergencies escalate (Dente et al., 2022; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
The COVID-19 pandemic further demonstrated that emerging health threats rarely remain confined to one species or one country. Human movement, global trade, wildlife interactions, environmental change, and climate-related disruptions all influence how diseases emerge and spread. At the same time, disasters such as floods, hurricanes, droughts, wildfires, and earthquakes can disrupt veterinary services, food production, disease surveillance, and healthcare infrastructure, increasing risks for both animal and public health (Khatri et al., 2023; Sikkema & Koopmans, 2025).
​
This educational hub introduces the major concepts that shape disaster preparedness and emerging health threats within the broader One Health & Public Health Overview knowledge system. It also serves as the gateway to more detailed discussions on disaster animal health, emerging infectious diseases, and outbreak response systems.
​
What This Major Pillar Covers
Disaster preparedness and emerging health threats encompass the strategies, systems, and collaborative efforts designed to reduce the impacts of natural hazards, disease outbreaks, environmental crises, and other emergencies affecting humans, animals, and ecosystems.
Unlike traditional emergency planning, which often focused on responding after disasters occurred, contemporary preparedness emphasizes anticipation, prevention, surveillance, coordination, and resilience. Scientific literature increasingly frames preparedness as a continuous process rather than a single emergency response plan (Bedi et al., 2021; Marron et al., 2025).
​
Within this pillar, readers will learn about:
​
-
The role of disaster preparedness in protecting animal and public health
-
How emerging infectious diseases develop and why many originate at the human-animal-environment interface
-
The importance of surveillance and early warning systems
-
Cross-sector collaboration through the One Health approach
-
Disaster resilience for veterinary and public health systems
-
Current research priorities addressing future health threats
Rather than focusing on specific diseases or disasters, this page provides a broad scientific framework that connects multiple disciplines involved in preparedness.
​
Why This Area Matters
Emerging health threats have become more complex because of globalization, environmental change, growing human populations, increased movement of animals and people, and changing ecosystems. These factors create more opportunities for infectious diseases to emerge, spread, or re-emerge while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that natural disasters will disrupt healthcare, veterinary infrastructure, agriculture, and food systems.
​
Scientific evidence consistently identifies preparedness as one of the most important investments for reducing the consequences of future emergencies. Effective preparedness improves the ability to recognize threats early, coordinate responses efficiently, protect essential services, and strengthen community resilience before crises become widespread (Bedi et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2023).
​
For veterinary medicine, preparedness extends beyond clinical care. Veterinarians contribute to:
​
-
Animal disease surveillance
-
Food system protection
-
Wildlife health monitoring
-
Zoonotic disease detection
-
Livestock continuity during disasters
-
Emergency animal welfare
-
Public health collaboration
These responsibilities illustrate why veterinary public health remains a critical component of national and international preparedness efforts.
Evidence also suggests that investments made before emergencies occur are generally more effective than relying exclusively on response after disasters unfold. Integrated surveillance, laboratory capacity, workforce training, and coordinated governance all support earlier intervention and help reduce broader societal impacts (Dente et al., 2022; Machalaba et al., 2018).
​
How This Major Pillar Relates to One Health & Public Health Overview
System Page: One Health & Public Health Overview
​
Disaster preparedness represents one of the clearest practical applications of the One Health approach. Most emerging health threats involve interactions among humans, animals, and the environment, making collaboration essential for effective prevention and response.
One Health recognizes that diseases and disasters rarely occur within isolated systems. For example:
​
-
Wildlife can serve as reservoirs for emerging pathogens.
-
Livestock health affects food security and rural livelihoods.
-
Companion animals share living environments with people during emergencies.
-
Environmental changes influence disease transmission.
-
Climate events alter habitats, vectors, and ecosystem health.
Preparedness therefore requires collaboration among veterinary professionals, physicians, epidemiologists, environmental scientists, emergency managers, laboratory specialists, policymakers, and community organizations.
​
Current literature emphasizes that preparedness is strongest when surveillance, communication, governance, and response systems are formally integrated across these sectors rather than functioning independently (Robbiati et al., 2023; Milano et al., 2024).
​
However, researchers also note that implementing One Health remains challenging. Many countries still face fragmented governance, inconsistent information sharing, limited environmental integration, and uneven investment across sectors, highlighting opportunities to strengthen preparedness systems (Kelly et al., 2020; Kouch, 2026).
​
Key Concepts Within This Pillar
Several interconnected concepts define disaster preparedness and emerging health threats within modern veterinary public health.
​
One Health
One Health is a collaborative framework recognizing that human, animal, and environmental health are closely connected. It encourages coordinated planning, surveillance, policy development, and emergency preparedness across multiple disciplines rather than independent sector-specific responses (Machalaba et al., 2018; Dente et al., 2022).
​
All-Hazards Preparedness
Current preparedness frameworks increasingly adopt an all-hazards perspective. Instead of focusing on a single disease or disaster type, preparedness systems are designed to address a broad range of biological, environmental, technological, and climate-related threats using flexible planning principles.
​
Integrated Surveillance
Surveillance extends beyond disease reporting alone. Modern systems combine human, animal, environmental, laboratory, modeling, and forecasting data to detect unusual patterns earlier and improve decision-making. Integrated surveillance is consistently identified as one of the strongest foundations for preparedness (Li et al., 2025; Bedi et al., 2021).
​
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emerging infectious diseases include newly identified diseases, diseases expanding into new geographic regions, pathogens adapting to new hosts, and previously controlled diseases that reappear. Many emerging infections involve animal reservoirs or environmental drivers, making veterinary surveillance particularly important.
​
Risk Assessment
Preparedness begins with understanding hazards before emergencies occur. Risk assessment evaluates threat likelihood, identifies vulnerable populations, examines environmental drivers, and informs planning priorities.
​
Coordination and Governance
Preparedness depends not only on scientific knowledge but also on effective governance. Research repeatedly identifies coordinated leadership, information sharing, defined responsibilities, and multisectoral partnerships as essential components of resilient preparedness systems (Marron et al., 2025; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
Prevention and Resilience
Preparedness increasingly emphasizes preventing disasters from becoming larger crises rather than relying solely on emergency response. Prevention includes strengthening surveillance, workforce capacity, laboratory systems, education, communication, infrastructure resilience, and cross-sector collaboration before emergencies occur.
​
The following sections explore the three major components of this pillar in greater depth:
​
Disaster Animal Health
Natural disasters, environmental emergencies, and complex crises can profoundly affect animal health, welfare, agriculture, and veterinary services. Learn more in our guide to Disaster Animal Health.
​
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emerging pathogens continue to challenge animal and public health through complex interactions among wildlife, livestock, companion animals, people, and ecosystems. Learn more in Emerging Infectious Diseases.
​
Outbreak Response Systems
Preparedness depends on surveillance, coordinated governance, communication, laboratories, and emergency response systems that function across multiple sectors. Explore Outbreak Response Systems for a deeper discussion.
​
Disaster Animal Health
Natural disasters and other emergencies affect far more than physical infrastructure. They can disrupt veterinary care, displace companion animals and livestock, interrupt food production, alter wildlife habitats, and increase opportunities for infectious disease transmission.
Because these impacts often occur simultaneously, disaster animal health has become a critical component of veterinary public health and modern emergency preparedness.
​
Current research increasingly views disaster animal health through a One Health lens, recognizing that the well-being of animals, people, and the environment is closely interconnected. Rather than treating animal rescue, disease control, environmental management, and public health as separate activities, preparedness frameworks encourage coordinated planning that considers the needs of all three sectors before, during, and after emergencies (Dente et al., 2022; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
Disasters affecting animals include a wide variety of hazards, such as:
​
-
Hurricanes and typhoons
-
Floods
-
Wildfires
-
Earthquakes
-
Droughts
-
Extreme heat events
-
Disease outbreaks
-
Chemical or environmental contamination
-
Climate-related emergencies
Each event type presents unique challenges, yet many preparedness principles remain consistent across hazards. This broad perspective is known as the all-hazards approach, which emphasizes flexible systems that can respond to multiple types of emergencies rather than preparing for only one specific event (Khatri et al., 2023; Marron et al., 2025).
​
Why Animal Health Matters During Disasters
Animals play numerous roles within human societies. Companion animals are family members for many households, livestock contribute to food production and rural economies, wildlife support ecosystem health, and working animals assist with agriculture, transportation, conservation, and emergency services. Consequently, disasters affecting animals often ripple through public health, food security, environmental sustainability, and community recovery.
​
For example, disruptions to livestock production may affect food availability and agricultural livelihoods, while wildlife displacement can alter interactions among wildlife, domestic animals, and humans. Companion animal evacuation also presents logistical and welfare challenges that influence household decision-making during emergencies.
​
The literature therefore emphasizes that protecting animal health contributes not only to animal welfare but also to broader community resilience and disaster recovery (Machalaba et al., 2018; Dente et al., 2022).
​
Veterinary Roles in Disaster Preparedness
Veterinarians contribute to disaster preparedness long before emergencies occur. Their expertise extends beyond individual animal care to include disease surveillance, food safety, epidemiology, animal welfare, emergency planning, and public health collaboration.
​
Within preparedness systems, veterinary professionals may participate in:
​
-
Monitoring animal disease trends
-
Supporting zoonotic disease surveillance
-
Advising on livestock biosecurity
-
Protecting food animal health
-
Contributing to emergency response planning
-
Collaborating with environmental and public health agencies
-
Assisting with wildlife health monitoring
-
Supporting laboratory investigations
These activities help strengthen early detection of health threats while supporting coordinated decision-making across multiple sectors.
Current One Health frameworks encourage veterinarians to work alongside physicians, epidemiologists, environmental scientists, emergency managers, laboratory specialists, policymakers, and community organizations rather than functioning independently. Such collaboration supports more comprehensive preparedness before disasters develop into larger public health emergencies (Kelly et al., 2020; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
Climate Change and Disaster Animal Health
Recent literature increasingly identifies climate change as an important driver of disaster-related health risks. Rising temperatures, changing rainfall patterns, expanding vector habitats, wildfires, floods, and other environmental changes influence both disaster frequency and disease emergence.
​
Climate-related events can affect:
​
-
Animal housing and welfare
-
Water availability
-
Feed production
-
Wildlife migration
-
Vector distribution
-
Habitat stability
-
Veterinary service delivery
Researchers increasingly recommend integrating climate resilience into preparedness planning instead of addressing climate hazards separately from infectious disease preparedness. This broader perspective reflects One Health's expanding scope beyond zoonotic diseases to include environmental resilience and community wellbeing (Martinez-Hollingworth et al., 2026).
​
Surveillance and Early Detection
One of the strongest themes across preparedness research is the importance of early detection. Animal populations often provide valuable information about emerging health threats because many infectious diseases originate or circulate in wildlife or domestic animals before affecting people.
​
Integrated surveillance systems collect information from multiple sources, including:
​
-
Veterinary reporting
-
Wildlife monitoring
-
Environmental surveillance
-
Laboratory testing
-
Epidemiologic investigations
-
Disease modeling
-
Risk forecasting
Combining these information streams improves the ability to recognize unusual disease patterns and supports faster public health decision-making (Li et al., 2025; Bedi et al., 2021).
​
Researchers also emphasize that surveillance should extend beyond monitoring diseases alone. Environmental changes, land-use patterns, climate conditions, wildlife movement, and other ecological drivers contribute important information for understanding where future health threats may emerge.
​
Challenges in Implementing Preparedness
Although scientific consensus strongly supports One Health preparedness, implementation remains uneven across countries and regions. Multiple studies identify recurring barriers that limit the effectiveness of disaster preparedness systems.
​
Common challenges include:
​
-
Fragmented governance across agencies
-
Limited information sharing
-
Insufficient laboratory capacity
-
Workforce shortages
-
Uneven funding
-
Variable surveillance infrastructure
-
Limited integration of environmental sectors
-
Inconsistent preparedness planning
These gaps illustrate that preparedness depends not only on scientific knowledge but also on organizational coordination, sustainable investment, and long-term institutional commitment (Milano et al., 2024; Kouch, 2026).
​
COVID-19 further demonstrated that preparedness systems benefit from strong cross-sector partnerships established before emergencies occur. Researchers continue to recommend formal governance structures, interoperable surveillance, workforce training, and coordinated planning as essential components of resilient disaster preparedness (Akello, 2025; Elhakim et al., 2024).
​
Disaster animal health therefore extends beyond responding to emergencies after they occur. Modern evidence increasingly supports an upstream approach centered on prevention, preparedness, integrated surveillance, and multisector collaboration that protects animal health while strengthening broader public health resilience.
​
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are among the most significant health challenges facing both veterinary and public health systems. These diseases include newly identified pathogens, known diseases appearing in new geographic regions or host species, and previously controlled diseases that re-emerge because of ecological, environmental, or societal changes. Their impacts often extend beyond human or animal health alone, influencing agriculture, food security, biodiversity, economies, and global health security.
​
Scientific evidence consistently demonstrates that emerging infectious diseases are best understood through a One Health approach, recognizing that humans, animals, and the environment are interconnected. Rather than viewing disease emergence solely as a medical problem, researchers increasingly examine the ecological and social conditions that allow pathogens to spill over between species and spread through populations (Sikkema & Koopmans, 2025; Dente et al., 2022).
​
Understanding Disease Emergence
Pathogens continually evolve alongside changing ecosystems, animal populations, and human activities. Most emerging infectious diseases do not arise from a single cause but from multiple interacting factors that increase opportunities for disease transmission.
Current literature identifies several important drivers of disease emergence, including:
​
-
Climate change
-
Land-use change
-
Deforestation
-
Urbanization
-
Wildlife habitat disturbance
-
Global travel
-
International trade
-
Agricultural intensification
-
Environmental degradation
-
Population growth
-
Political instability
These drivers influence how wildlife, domestic animals, people, and vectors interact, creating new opportunities for pathogens to cross species barriers. Consequently, preparedness increasingly focuses on identifying and managing these underlying drivers rather than responding only after outbreaks begin (Machalaba et al., 2018; Sikkema & Koopmans, 2025; Khatri et al., 2023).
​
This shift represents an important evolution in preparedness science. Modern One Health frameworks increasingly emphasize prevention at the source, aiming to reduce spillover risks before pathogens become widespread public health emergencies.
​
The Human–Animal–Environment Interface
Many emerging pathogens originate where humans, animals, and environmental systems intersect. Wildlife reservoirs, livestock production, companion animals, environmental changes, and human activities all contribute to complex ecological networks that influence disease transmission.
​
The One Health approach acknowledges that protecting only one sector is insufficient. Instead, surveillance and preparedness efforts seek to better understand the interactions among:
​
-
Wildlife populations
-
Domestic animals
-
Livestock systems
-
Human communities
-
Environmental conditions
-
Ecosystem health
Because these systems continuously influence one another, effective preparedness requires collaboration across veterinary medicine, medicine, ecology, environmental science, agriculture, and public health.
​
Researchers consistently recommend integrated planning that recognizes these shared risks rather than addressing human and animal health independently (Kelly et al., 2020; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
The Importance of Surveillance
Early detection remains one of the strongest themes throughout the preparedness literature. Emerging infectious diseases often develop gradually before becoming widespread outbreaks, making surveillance essential for recognizing unusual events as early as possible.
​
Modern surveillance extends far beyond routine disease reporting by incorporating environmental indicators, such as vector density mapping, soil and water pathogen testing, and land-use tracking alongside clinical monitoring. Integrated surveillance systems combine information from numerous sources, including:
​
-
Veterinary diagnostic laboratories
-
Human healthcare reporting
-
Wildlife monitoring
-
Environmental surveillance
-
Disease modeling
-
Geographic information systems
-
Risk forecasting
-
Genomic surveillance
-
Epidemiologic investigations
Bringing these data sources together supports earlier recognition of disease trends, improves risk assessment, and strengthens preparedness planning across sectors (Li et al., 2025; Bedi et al., 2021).
​
Researchers also note that surveillance increasingly incorporates environmental and ecological indicators, such as climate shifts and habitat disruption, allowing preparedness systems to monitor drivers of disease emergence before human or animal illness becomes widespread.
​
Prevention Through One Health
The scientific literature consistently supports shifting preparedness upstream toward prevention rather than relying exclusively on emergency response.
​
This preventive approach includes strengthening:
​
-
Integrated surveillance systems
-
Risk assessment
-
Laboratory capacity
-
Workforce education
-
Cross-sector communication
-
Governance structures
-
Information sharing
-
Early warning systems
Researchers argue that identifying spillover risks before sustained transmission occurs may reduce the health, economic, and societal consequences associated with major outbreaks (Bedi et al., 2021; Dente et al., 2022).
​
This preventive philosophy has become a defining feature of contemporary One Health preparedness and distinguishes it from older response-centered models.
​
Lessons from Recent Global Health Emergencies
Recent global health emergencies have highlighted both the strengths and limitations of existing preparedness systems. COVID-19, in particular, reinforced the importance of coordinated surveillance, rapid information sharing, multidisciplinary collaboration, and resilient governance.
​
Across the literature, COVID-19 is frequently cited as evidence that many preparedness systems lacked sufficient integration among veterinary, medical, environmental, and governmental sectors. Fragmented responsibilities, inconsistent communication, and uneven preparedness capacity limited the effectiveness of early responses in many settings (Robbiati et al., 2023; Akello, 2025).
​
These experiences have accelerated efforts to strengthen national and international preparedness through more formal One Health governance and collaborative planning.
​
Continuing Challenges
Although support for One Health has expanded considerably, researchers continue to identify important implementation challenges.
Common gaps include:
​
-
Fragmented institutional coordination
-
Limited interoperability between surveillance systems
-
Uneven laboratory resources
-
Inconsistent funding
-
Workforce shortages
-
Variable access to training
-
Limited environmental integration
-
Insufficient evaluation metrics
Several studies also note that many preparedness systems remain heavily focused on infectious diseases while giving comparatively less attention to climate-related hazards, environmental disruptions, and other complex threats that increasingly influence disease emergence (Mwatondo et al., 2023; Martinez-Hollingworth et al., 2026).
​
Addressing these challenges requires sustained collaboration among veterinary professionals, physicians, environmental scientists, policymakers, emergency managers, and public health organizations. Researchers emphasize that preparedness should be viewed as a continuous process of strengthening systems, not a fixed endpoint achieved through a single policy or emergency plan.
Ultimately, emerging infectious diseases illustrate why the One Health framework has become central to modern preparedness. By integrating surveillance, prevention, governance, and environmental awareness, One Health provides a comprehensive scientific framework for understanding and preparing for health threats that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
​
Outbreak Response Systems
Preparedness becomes meaningful only when plans, surveillance systems, and collaborative networks can be translated into coordinated action during an emergency. Outbreak response systems provide the organizational framework that allows health authorities, veterinary services, laboratories, emergency managers, and government agencies to detect, investigate, communicate, and respond to emerging health threats.
​
Modern response systems extend well beyond emergency reaction alone. Current evidence emphasizes that successful outbreak response depends on activities that begin long before an emergency occurs, including surveillance, workforce training, risk assessment, laboratory readiness, communication planning, and multisectoral governance. As a result, preparedness and response are increasingly viewed as continuous components of the same health security system rather than separate stages of emergency management (Lee et al., 2023; Marron et al., 2025).
​
Building Coordinated Response Systems
Health emergencies frequently involve multiple organizations with different responsibilities. Veterinary authorities may monitor animal health events, laboratories confirm diagnoses, public health agencies assess human risks, environmental agencies evaluate ecological impacts, and emergency management organizations coordinate logistics and communication.
​
Without clearly defined structures for collaboration, these activities can become fragmented. Consequently, the One Health literature consistently emphasizes multisectoral governance as a foundation of effective outbreak response.
​
Key components of coordinated response systems include:
-
Clearly defined leadership structures
-
Formal communication pathways
-
Shared decision-making frameworks
-
Interagency coordination
-
Standardized reporting procedures
-
Information-sharing agreements
-
Emergency operations planning
-
Cross-sector partnerships
Researchers note that governance structures established before emergencies occur generally facilitate more efficient coordination during rapidly evolving situations (Dente et al., 2022; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
The Role of Surveillance in Response
Outbreak response begins with recognizing an unusual health event. For this reason, surveillance remains the cornerstone of modern response systems.
​
Integrated surveillance combines information from multiple sectors to support:
​
-
Early detection
-
Risk assessment
-
Situational awareness
-
Trend analysis
-
Resource prioritization
-
Forecasting
-
Decision support
Scientific evidence increasingly supports surveillance systems that integrate human, animal, and environmental information rather than maintaining separate reporting systems. This integrated approach improves opportunities to identify spillover events, recognize changing disease patterns, and coordinate public health interventions more efficiently (Li et al., 2025; Bedi et al., 2021).
​
Researchers also emphasize that surveillance should include predictive elements such as modeling, forecasting, and analysis of environmental drivers to strengthen preparedness before outbreaks expand.
​
Laboratories and Risk Assessment
Laboratory systems provide the diagnostic capacity necessary to confirm suspected outbreaks and characterize emerging pathogens. However, laboratory readiness alone is insufficient. Current preparedness frameworks integrate laboratory findings with epidemiologic investigations, surveillance data, environmental observations, and risk assessments to develop a broader understanding of emerging threats.
​
Risk assessment helps decision-makers evaluate:
​
-
The likelihood of disease spread
-
Potential impacts on human and animal populations
-
Environmental influences
-
Vulnerable populations
-
Resource requirements
-
Operational priorities
This integrated approach supports more informed planning while recognizing that health emergencies often evolve rapidly as new information becomes available (Marron et al., 2025).
​
Communication and Workforce Preparedness
Preparedness research consistently identifies communication as a fundamental component of outbreak response. Timely information sharing among agencies supports coordinated decision-making, while clear communication with communities helps maintain public awareness and operational continuity during emergencies.
​
Equally important is workforce preparedness. Effective response systems depend on trained professionals across multiple disciplines, including:
​
-
Veterinarians
-
Physicians
-
Epidemiologists
-
Laboratory scientists
-
Environmental specialists
-
Emergency managers
-
Risk communication professionals
-
Public health practitioners
Several studies recommend continued investment in multidisciplinary education, simulation exercises, emergency planning, and collaborative training to strengthen workforce readiness before emergencies occur (Elhakim et al., 2024; Akello, 2025).
​
Ongoing Challenges
Although considerable progress has been made in preparedness planning, numerous implementation challenges remain. Researchers repeatedly identify fragmented governance, inconsistent information sharing, uneven surveillance capacity, insufficient funding, and limited environmental integration as barriers to effective outbreak response.
​
Another recurring challenge is translating One Health principles into routine operational practice. Many national preparedness plans endorse cross-sector collaboration conceptually but have yet to fully integrate veterinary, environmental, and public health systems into coordinated emergency operations (Milano et al., 2024; Kouch, 2026).
​
Researchers therefore continue to advocate for stronger governance frameworks, interoperable surveillance, sustained workforce development, laboratory strengthening, and continuous evaluation of preparedness systems.
​
Collectively, these efforts support more resilient outbreak response systems that can address current and future health threats in an increasingly interconnected world.
​
Current Research Themes
Research on disaster preparedness and emerging health threats continues to evolve alongside changing environmental conditions, technological advances, and global health priorities. While preparedness has long focused on responding to emergencies, recent evidence increasingly supports a broader strategy centered on prevention, resilience, and cross-sector collaboration.
​
Several major themes consistently emerge across the current literature.
​
Expanding One Health Beyond Zoonotic Diseases
Although zoonotic diseases remain a central concern, researchers increasingly apply the One Health framework to climate change, environmental degradation, disaster resilience, workforce wellbeing, food security, and broader community health. This expanded perspective reflects growing recognition that many health threats share common environmental and societal drivers (Martinez-Hollingworth et al., 2026; Robbiati et al., 2023).
​
Improving Integrated Surveillance
Integrated surveillance remains one of the most active research areas. Scientists continue exploring methods for combining veterinary, medical, wildlife, laboratory, environmental, and forecasting data into interoperable early warning systems that support faster recognition of emerging threats (Li et al., 2025).
​
Strengthening Governance
Research increasingly focuses on improving coordination among government agencies, veterinary authorities, environmental organizations, and public health institutions. Establishing formal governance structures remains a priority for translating One Health concepts into consistent operational practice (Dente et al., 2022; Milano et al., 2024).
​
Investing in Workforce Capacity
Preparedness depends on knowledgeable professionals who can collaborate across disciplines. Current studies continue evaluating educational models, simulation exercises, competency development, and interdisciplinary training that strengthen emergency preparedness across veterinary and public health systems (Akello, 2025; Elhakim et al., 2024).
​
Measuring Preparedness
Researchers increasingly recognize that preparedness is difficult to evaluate consistently. Developing practical indicators that measure preparedness capacity, system resilience, collaboration, and early warning performance remains an important area for future investigation.
​
Frequently Asked Questions
What is disaster preparedness in veterinary public health?
Disaster preparedness in veterinary public health refers to coordinated planning and capacity-building that help protect animal, human, and environmental health before, during, and after emergencies. It includes surveillance, workforce preparedness, laboratory capacity, governance, communication, and multisector collaboration.
What are emerging infectious diseases?
Emerging infectious diseases are diseases that are newly identified, expanding into new populations or geographic areas, changing hosts, or reappearing after periods of decline. Many are influenced by interactions among humans, animals, and the environment.
Why is the One Health approach important for disaster preparedness?
One Health recognizes that many health threats cross the boundaries between human, animal, and environmental health. Coordinated planning across these sectors supports earlier detection, improved preparedness, and more effective outbreak response.
How does surveillance improve preparedness?
Integrated surveillance combines information from human, animal, environmental, and laboratory sources to identify unusual events earlier, strengthen risk assessment, and support informed decision-making before emergencies escalate.
What challenges remain in preparedness systems?
Current research identifies fragmented governance, inconsistent information sharing, unequal resources, limited workforce capacity, and difficulties implementing coordinated One Health approaches as continuing challenges across many regions.
​
Explore Related Topics
Continue exploring the One Health & Public Health Overview knowledge system:
​
-
One Health & Public Health Overview
-
Disaster Animal Health
-
Emerging Infectious Diseases
-
Outbreak Response Systems
Together, these resources provide an evidence-based introduction to disaster preparedness, emerging health threats, and the collaborative One Health principles that support resilient veterinary and public health systems.
Written by Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM
Disclaimer
This content is intended for general educational purposes only and is informed by established veterinary research and consensus. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. For concerns about an individual animals’s health or well-being, consult a licensed veterinarian.
References
-
Akello, W. (2025). Harnessing the power of One Health education to tackle Emerging Infectious Diseases (EIDs) and other global health challenges. One Health Outlook, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-025-00139-7
-
Bedi, J., Vijay, D., Dhaka, P., Gill, J. S. S., & Barbuddhe, S. (2021). Emergency preparedness for public health threats, surveillance, modelling & forecasting. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 153, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_653_21
-
Dente, M., Riccardo, F., Declich, S., Milano, A., Robbiati, C., Agrimi, U., Mantovani, A., Morabito, S., Scavia, G., Cubadda, F., Villa, L., Monaco, M., Mancini, L., Carere, M., Marcheggiani, S., Lavazza, A., Farina, M., Dar, O., Villa, M., … Brusaferro, S. (2022). Strengthening preparedness against global health threats: A paradigm shift based on One Health approaches. One Health, 14, 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100396
-
Dente, M., Riccardo, F., Milano, A., Robbiati, C., Agrimi, U., Morabito, S., Carere, M., Marcheggiani, S., Mantovani, A., Mancini, L., Villa, L., Monaco, M., Scavia, G., Cubadda, F., & Declich, S. (2022). A One Health-based conceptual framework for comprehensive and coordinated prevention and preparedness to health threats. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.256
-
Elhakim, M., Hammoud, S., Gmach, S., Albadri, J., Mahrous, H., Arifi, F., Latif, N. A., Moussa, S., Anan, H., Saidouni, A., Ghazy, R., Elkholy, A., El-Sakka, H., & Samhouri, D. (2024). Learning interventions in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: Supporting Member States to get prepared for better response to health emergencies in the region. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1441223
-
Kelly, T., Machalaba, C., Karesh, W., Crook, P., Gilardi, K., Nziza, J., Uhart, M., Robles, E. A., Saylors, K., Joly, D., Monagin, C., Mangombo, P. M., Kingebeni, P., Kazwala, R., Wolking, D. J., Smith, W., & Mazet, J. (2020). Implementing One Health approaches to confront emerging and re-emerging zoonotic disease threats: Lessons from PREDICT. One Health Outlook, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-019-0007-9
-
Khatri, R., Endalamaw, A., Erku, D., Wolka, E., Nigatu, F., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2023). Preparedness, impacts, and responses of public health emergencies towards health security: Qualitative synthesis of evidence. Archives of Public Health, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01223-y
-
Kouch, A. G. T. (2026). Assessment of Emergency Preparedness and Response Using One Health Approach in Juba, South Sudan. Texila International Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.21522/tijph.2013.14.01.art037
-
Lamberti-Castronuovo, A., Valente, M., Barone-Adesi, F., Hubloue, I., & Ragazzoni, L. (2022). Primary health care disaster preparedness: A review of the literature and the proposal of a new framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103278
-
Lee, J., Jansen, R., Sanderson, K., Guerra, F., Keller-Olaman, S., Murti, M., O'Sullivan, T. L., Law, M., Schwartz, B., Bourns, L. E., & Khan, Y. (2023). Public health emergency preparedness for infectious disease emergencies: A scoping review of recent evidence. BMC Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15313-7
-
Li, Z., Li, D., Dong, J., Zhu, Q., Zuo, Y., Pu, J., Wang, L., Lei, W., Cai, J., Cheng, Q., Li, Y., Yang, J., Ju, Y., & Wu, Z. (2025). Integrated health surveillance and early warning systems in China under the One Health perspective: Progress and challenges. Science in One Health, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soh.2025.100132
-
Machalaba, C., Salerno, R. H., Behravesh, B. C., Benigno, S., Berthe, F., Chungong, S., Duale, S., Echalar, R., Karesh, W., Ormel, H. J., Pelican, K. M., Rahman, M., Rasmuson, M., Scribner, S., Stratton, J., Suryantoro, L., & Wannous, C. (2018). Institutionalizing One Health: From assessment to action. Health Security, 16(S1), S37–S43. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2018.0064
-
Marron, L., Gilroy, J., Williams, M. A., Parlour, R., & Boland, M. (2025). A narrative literature review to inform the development of a health threats preparedness framework in Ireland. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490850
-
Martinez-Hollingworth, A., Milatovich, N., Scherer, M., Inzunza, Z., Kim, L., Czerwinski, M., Garza, J. R., Kohout, E., Chan, G. K., & Eisenman, D. P. (2026). Community health in a climate disaster: A One Health analysis of workforce exposure in the Eaton wildfire. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, 1768565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1768565
-
Milano, A., Robbiati, C., Declich, S., Calistri, P., Pediconi, O., Amato, L., Paronyan, L., Avetisyan, L., Manucharyan, A., Avetisyan, G., Yesayan, T., Gevorgyan, A., Markosyan, T., & Dente, M. (2024). Assessing the adoption of One Health approaches in national plans to combat health threats: The pilot of a One Health conceptual framework in Armenia. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9010022
-
Mwatondo, A., Rahman-Shepherd, A., Hollmann, L., Chiossi, S., Maina, J., Kurup, K., Hassan, O. A., Coates, B., Khan, M., Spencer, J., Mutono, N., Thumbi, S., Muturi, M., Mutunga, M., Arruda, L. B., Akhbari, M., Ettehad, D., Ntoumi, F., Scott, T., … Dar, O. (2023). A global analysis of One Health networks and the proliferation of One Health collaborations. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01596-3
-
Robbiati, C., Milano, A., Declich, S., Di Domenico, K., Mancini, L., Pizzarelli, S., D’Angelo, F., Riccardo, F., Scavia, G., & Dente, M. (2023). One Health adoption within prevention, preparedness and response to health threats: Highlights from a scoping review. One Health, 17, 100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100613
-
Sikkema, R. S., & Koopmans, M. (2025). Viral emergence and pandemic preparedness in a One Health framework. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 24, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01243-1