Microbiome, Gut Health and Functional Nutrition
The intestinal microbiome has become one of the most active areas of aquaculture research because it connects nutrition, immunity, metabolism, and environmental management into a single biological system. Rather than serving only as a site for digestion, the gastrointestinal tract functions as a dynamic interface where the host, resident microorganisms, diet, and aquatic environment continually influence one another. This interaction affects how efficiently nutrients are utilized, how effectively the intestinal barrier responds to stressors, and how fish and shellfish adapt to changing production conditions. Research increasingly recognizes the gut microbiota as an important contributor to animal performance and health, although many aspects of its function remain species-specific and incompletely understood (Rai et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2018).
​
Modern aquaculture has also shifted attention beyond maximizing growth alone. Healthy production systems increasingly emphasize feed efficiency, resilience to environmental stress, welfare, and sustainable resource use. These broader goals have encouraged investigation into microbiome-aware nutritional strategies, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, functional ingredients, and alternative feed materials that influence intestinal microbial communities while supporting overall fish health (Marcharla et al., 2025; Puri et al., 2022; Khan, 2026).
Although scientific understanding has advanced rapidly, researchers continue to emphasize that no single "ideal" microbiome exists across all cultured aquatic species. Differences in host genetics, diet, developmental stage, production system, water quality, and surrounding microbial communities create substantial variation between species and even among populations of the same species. Consequently, microbiome science focuses less on identifying a universal microbial profile and more on understanding how balanced microbial communities support intestinal function, immune regulation, and long-term health under specific production conditions (Legrand et al., 2020; Tay et al., 2025).
​
As part of the Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview, this major pillar introduces the scientific principles underlying fish gut microbiology, host–microbe interactions, and functional nutrition. It provides the foundation for understanding how intestinal ecosystems contribute to sustainable aquaculture and links to more detailed discussions within each related topic.
​
What This Major Pillar Covers
This major pillar explores the biological relationship between the intestinal microbiome, gut health, and functional nutrition in aquaculture species. Together, these interconnected topics explain how microorganisms living within the gastrointestinal tract influence digestion, metabolism, immune function, and overall physiological balance throughout the production cycle.
​
Current research generally organizes this field into three complementary areas:
​
-
Fish Gut Microbiome examines the diversity, composition, and ecological roles of microorganisms inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract. Studies investigate how microbial communities contribute to digestion, nutrient metabolism, immune regulation, and resistance to opportunistic pathogens while responding to changes in diet, environment, and host biology (Luan et al., 2023; Kanika et al., 2025).
-
Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics focus on nutritional approaches that intentionally influence microbial communities. Rather than serving as medications, these functional feed components are investigated for their ability to support microbial balance, intestinal integrity, nutrient utilization, and immune function within aquaculture systems (Egerton et al., 2018; Puri et al., 2022).
-
Host–Microbe Interactions examines the complex biological communication between intestinal microorganisms and the host. This includes regulation of mucosal immunity—ranging from gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) responses in teleost fish to innate hemocyte-mediated defenses in crustaceans—alongside the maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity, metabolic signaling, and adaptation to environmental stressors (Dawood, 2020; Rai et al., 2025).
Together, these areas illustrate that gut health is not determined by any single microorganism or dietary ingredient. Instead, it emerges from continuous interactions among the host, resident microbiota, nutrition, and the surrounding aquatic environment.
​
Why This Area Matters
The gastrointestinal tract performs far more functions than nutrient digestion alone. It represents one of the largest interfaces between cultured aquatic animals and their external environment, serving simultaneously as a digestive organ, an immune organ, and a habitat for complex microbial ecosystems. Maintaining balance within this system is increasingly recognized as an important component of sustainable aquaculture.
​
Accumulating evidence indicates that gut microorganisms participate in multiple physiological processes, including digestion of dietary components, synthesis of bioactive metabolites, regulation of nutrient utilization, maintenance of epithelial barrier function, and modulation of immune responses. Because these microorganisms interact continuously with intestinal tissues, alterations in microbial community structure have the potential to influence overall animal health beyond the digestive tract itself (Rai et al., 2025; Yukgehnaish et al., 2020).
Researchers often describe the microbiome as functioning similarly to an additional metabolic organ because of its broad contributions to digestion, energy balance, and host physiology. Rather than acting independently, microbial communities cooperate with host tissues to process nutrients and maintain intestinal homeostasis (Rai et al., 2025).
​
Conversely, disruption of microbial balance—commonly referred to as dysbiosis—has been associated with reduced intestinal stability and increased susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens. Although dysbiosis does not represent a specific disease, it reflects shifts in microbial composition that may accompany environmental stress, dietary changes, or other physiological disturbances. Current evidence suggests that maintaining balanced microbial communities supports intestinal resilience, whereas disrupted communities may coincide with greater disease risk under intensive production systems (Tay et al., 2025; Kanika et al., 2025).
​
Importantly, growth performance alone no longer represents the sole indicator of nutritional success. Increasingly, researchers recognize that fish exhibiting satisfactory growth may still possess intestinal microbial communities that differ substantially in composition and function. Consequently, modern evaluations of aquaculture nutrition increasingly incorporate gut health, immune competence, microbial ecology, and long-term resilience alongside traditional production metrics (Singh et al., 2024).
​
How This Major Pillar Relates to Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview
This major pillar forms one component of the broader Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview, which examines the biological systems that collectively influence aquatic animal health, welfare, and sustainable production.
While other major pillars focus on nutrition, biosecurity, water quality, disease prevention, reproduction, or production management, the microbiome provides an important biological link connecting many of these disciplines. Dietary composition influences microbial communities, environmental conditions shape microbial diversity, and intestinal microorganisms interact with immune responses that contribute to overall fish health. As a result, microbiome science increasingly serves as an interdisciplinary bridge between nutrition, physiology, immunology, and environmental management.
Within the larger knowledge system, this page introduces the foundational concepts needed to understand how microbial ecosystems contribute to fish health without examining each topic in exhaustive detail. Readers interested in more specialized discussions can continue to the following related educational resources:
​
-
Fish Gut Microbiome
-
Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
-
Host–Microbe Interactions
​
Readers seeking a broader introduction to aquatic animal health can also return to the Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview system page.
​
Key Concepts Within This Pillar
Several recurring concepts appear throughout microbiome and functional nutrition research. Understanding these principles provides useful context for interpreting emerging studies across different aquaculture species.
​
The microbiome is highly dynamic. Unlike relatively stable host organs, microbial communities continually change in response to diet, age, environmental conditions, husbandry practices, and microbial exposure from surrounding water. Consequently, microbial composition represents an evolving ecosystem rather than a fixed biological characteristic (Ringø et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2024).
​
Host species strongly influence microbial composition. Different fish species support distinct microbial communities, and even closely related species may exhibit substantial differences in microbiome structure. Host genetics, digestive anatomy, feeding behavior, and habitat all contribute to this diversity (Luan et al., 2023; Kanika et al., 2025).
​
Gut health extends beyond digestion. The intestinal tract functions simultaneously as a digestive, metabolic, immunological, and barrier organ. Maintaining epithelial integrity and balanced microbial communities contributes to mucosal defense and whole-body physiological function (Dawood, 2020).
​
Nutrition shapes microbial ecology. Functional feed ingredients—including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, alternative proteins, phytogenic compounds, and selected mineral forms—are increasingly studied for their capacity to influence microbial community composition and intestinal function. These approaches represent nutritional modulation rather than direct disease treatment (Marcharla et al., 2025; Hasan et al., 2023; Aydın & Çek, 2026).
​
No universal healthy microbiome has been identified. One key conclusion from recent research is that no single microbial profile defines health across all cultured fish. Instead, healthy microbial communities appear to be context-dependent, varying according to species, life stage, production environment, and nutritional conditions (Legrand et al., 2020; Tay et al., 2025).
​
Together, these concepts establish the scientific foundation for understanding how gut microorganisms contribute to aquaculture health and why microbiome-aware nutrition has become an important area of contemporary veterinary and fisheries research.
​
Fish Gut Microbiome
The fish gastrointestinal tract hosts a diverse and dynamic community of microorganisms collectively known as the gut microbiome. This microbial ecosystem includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, and other microscopic organisms that interact continuously with intestinal tissues and dietary nutrients. Rather than being passive inhabitants, these microorganisms contribute to digestion, metabolism, immune regulation, and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. As a result, the gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as an important component of aquatic animal biology and a major focus of contemporary aquaculture research (Rai et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2018).
​
Unlike terrestrial livestock, cultured fish live in continuous contact with a microbe-rich aquatic environment. Water, sediment, feed, and surrounding organisms all contribute microorganisms that may colonize the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, the fish microbiome is influenced not only by host biology but also by environmental conditions, making it one of the most responsive microbial ecosystems studied in animal agriculture (Chen et al., 2022; Yukgehnaish et al., 2020).
​
The Gut Microbiome Functions as an Accessory Organ
Current evidence suggests that the intestinal microbiome functions much like an additional metabolic organ. Gut microorganisms participate in the breakdown of dietary compounds, production of biologically active metabolites, nutrient assimilation, and regulation of host metabolic pathways. These activities complement the physiological functions of the digestive system and contribute to efficient utilization of available nutrients (Rai et al., 2025; Butt & Volkoff, 2019).
​
Research also indicates that microbial communities influence energy homeostasis by interacting with host metabolic signaling pathways. These interactions extend beyond digestion and help explain why microbiome research has become increasingly relevant to studies of growth performance, feed conversion, and physiological adaptation in aquaculture species (Butt & Volkoff, 2019; Dvergedal et al., 2020).
In addition to metabolic functions, resident microorganisms contribute to the production of metabolites that influence intestinal physiology and communication between the gut and immune system. These microbial products form part of the complex biochemical environment that supports normal gastrointestinal function and overall health (Luan et al., 2023).
​
Microbial Communities Vary Among Species
One of the defining characteristics of the fish gut microbiome is its remarkable diversity. Different fish species harbor distinct microbial communities, reflecting differences in digestive anatomy, feeding ecology, evolutionary history, habitat, and physiology. Freshwater and marine species often exhibit different microbial profiles, while carnivorous, omnivorous, and herbivorous fish also differ in microbiome composition due to variation in dietary substrates available to intestinal microorganisms (Egerton et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2024).
​
Even within the same species, microbial communities change throughout development. Early-life microbial colonization differs from that observed in juvenile or adult fish, and microbial succession continues as animals encounter new diets and production environments. Developmental transitions such as freshwater-to-seawater transfer in salmonids illustrate how microbial communities respond dynamically to changing physiological and environmental conditions (Wang et al., 2021; Naya-Català et al., 2022).
​
Researchers also recognize that host genetics influence microbiome composition. Genetic background shapes intestinal physiology and immune function, which in turn affect the types of microorganisms capable of establishing stable communities within the gastrointestinal tract (Naya-Català et al., 2022; De León et al., 2024).
​
Diet and Environment Continuously Shape the Microbiome
Among all factors affecting microbial composition, diet consistently emerges as one of the strongest drivers. Changes in protein sources, lipid composition, carbohydrate content, fiber, functional ingredients, and feeding strategies alter nutrient availability within the intestine, creating conditions that favor different microbial populations. Compared with many terrestrial vertebrates, fish microbiomes appear particularly responsive to dietary modification (Ringø et al., 2016; Rai et al., 2025).
​
Environmental conditions further influence microbial ecology. Water quality, temperature, salinity, oxygen concentration, habitat, and microbial communities present in surrounding water all contribute to changes in intestinal microbial diversity. Because cultured aquatic animals remain immersed in their environment throughout life, external microbial ecosystems interact continuously with the gastrointestinal tract (Chen et al., 2022; Dehler et al., 2017).
​
These multiple influences explain why microbial communities differ not only between species but also among production systems, geographic regions, and management practices. Consequently, interpreting microbiome studies requires consideration of both biological and environmental context rather than assuming that observations from one species apply universally to another.
​
Microbial Balance Supports Intestinal Homeostasis
Although microbial composition varies widely, research consistently supports the importance of maintaining a balanced intestinal ecosystem. A diverse and stable microbial community contributes to digestion, nutrient utilization, intestinal barrier function, and regulation of immune activity. Balanced microbial populations also help limit the expansion of opportunistic microorganisms through ecological competition and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis (Kanika et al., 2025; Rai et al., 2025).
​
Conversely, disruption of microbial balance—known as dysbiosis—has been associated with reduced intestinal stability and increased disease susceptibility. Dysbiosis is characterized by alterations in microbial composition rather than the presence of a single pathogen and has been linked with environmental stress, nutritional disturbances, and disease outbreaks in aquaculture systems (Tay et al., 2025; Xavier et al., 2023).
​
Importantly, researchers caution that dysbiosis should not be interpreted simply as the absence of specific microorganisms. Instead, it reflects disruption of ecological balance within the gut microbiome. Because microbial communities differ substantially among species, defining dysbiosis remains challenging, and no universal reference profile currently exists for healthy farmed fish (Legrand et al., 2020; Tay et al., 2025).
​
This lack of a standardized "healthy microbiome" represents one of the most important research challenges in aquaculture microbiology. Advances in sequencing technologies have greatly improved identification of microbial species, yet understanding what those microorganisms actually do—and how their functions contribute to health—remains an active area of investigation. Increasingly, researchers emphasize functional analyses that examine microbial metabolism and host interactions alongside traditional taxonomic profiling (Legrand et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023).
​
The growing understanding of fish gut microbiomes provides the scientific foundation for nutritional strategies designed to support beneficial microbial communities. Among the most extensively studied approaches are probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, which are explored in the next section.
​
Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotics
Functional nutrition has become an increasingly important area of aquaculture because nutritional strategies influence more than growth performance alone. Modern research recognizes that feed composition shapes the intestinal environment, affects microbial communities, and contributes to physiological processes associated with digestion, immune regulation, and intestinal integrity. Within this field, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics represent the most extensively studied microbiome-directed nutritional approaches. Rather than replacing conventional nutrition, these functional feed components are investigated for their ability to support balanced microbial ecosystems that contribute to overall fish health (Egerton et al., 2018; Puri et al., 2022; Kanika et al., 2025).
​
As understanding of the fish microbiome has expanded, functional nutrition has evolved from simply meeting nutrient requirements toward influencing the biological interactions occurring within the gastrointestinal tract. These nutritional strategies seek to promote favorable microbial communities, reinforce intestinal barrier function, and support immune homeostasis while reducing reliance on antimicrobial interventions. Although the underlying mechanisms continue to be investigated, microbiome-aware nutrition has become an important research priority for sustainable aquaculture (Marcharla et al., 2025; Khan, 2026).
​
Understanding Functional Feed Components
The three major microbiome-directed nutritional strategies differ in their biological roles, although all aim to influence the intestinal ecosystem.
​
Probiotics are live microorganisms administered through feed or water with the objective of supporting beneficial microbial populations within the gastrointestinal tract. Research has investigated numerous bacterial species capable of interacting with resident microbiota, competing with opportunistic organisms, and contributing to normal intestinal function. In aquaculture, probiotics remain the most widely studied functional feed intervention for microbiome modulation (Egerton et al., 2018; Puri et al., 2022).
​
Prebiotics differ because they are non-living dietary substrates that selectively support the growth or activity of beneficial intestinal microorganisms. By providing fermentable compounds utilized by specific microbial populations, prebiotics seek to encourage a balanced microbial ecosystem without introducing new microorganisms into the digestive tract (Burr et al., 2005; Baumgärtner et al., 2022).
​
Synbiotics combine probiotics and prebiotics into a single nutritional strategy. The underlying concept is that providing beneficial microorganisms together with suitable nutritional substrates may improve establishment, persistence, and function of those microorganisms within the intestinal environment. Although synbiotics have demonstrated encouraging findings in experimental studies, responses continue to vary among species and production conditions (Puri et al., 2022; Dhanasiri et al., 2023).
​
Together, these approaches represent complementary strategies for modifying the intestinal ecosystem through nutrition rather than direct therapeutic intervention.
​
Functional Nutrition Extends Beyond Traditional Feed Formulation
Current aquaculture research increasingly evaluates feed ingredients not only for their nutritional value but also for their influence on gut microbial ecology. This broader perspective has expanded the concept of functional feeds, which include dietary components capable of influencing intestinal physiology, microbial balance, or immune function in addition to supplying essential nutrients (Marcharla et al., 2025; Khan, 2026).
​
Among the nutritional innovations receiving considerable attention are alternative protein sources, including insect-derived ingredients. Beyond improving feed sustainability, these ingredients have demonstrated the ability to modify gut microbial communities, potentially influencing microbial diversity and intestinal function. Such findings illustrate that feed ingredients affect more than nutrient composition—they also shape the biological environment within the digestive tract (Hasan et al., 2023; Aragão et al., 2022).
​
Researchers are also investigating phytogenic compounds, immunostimulatory ingredients, microbial metabolites, and postbiotic preparations as additional functional nutritional strategies. While these approaches differ in composition and proposed mechanisms, they share the common objective of supporting intestinal homeostasis through interactions with the gut microbiome and host physiology rather than simply increasing growth rates (Marcharla et al., 2025; Pérez-Gómez et al., 2025).
​
Another emerging area involves targeted mineral nutrition. Recent studies suggest that the chemical form of dietary minerals influences microbial responses, with organic mineral sources and certain nanoparticle formulations often demonstrating more favorable effects on gut microbial communities than conventional inorganic forms. Although this field remains relatively new, it highlights the growing recognition that micronutrients influence intestinal biology beyond correcting nutritional deficiencies (Aydın & Çek, 2026).
​
Benefits Are Multifactorial and Species-Specific
One of the strongest themes emerging from contemporary research is that microbiome-directed nutrition produces interconnected biological effects rather than isolated outcomes. Functional feed strategies are generally evaluated for their influence on several related parameters, including microbial diversity, nutrient utilization, intestinal morphology, mucosal integrity, immune responses, oxidative balance, and feed efficiency. Because these physiological systems interact closely, improvements in one area frequently coincide with changes in others (Marcharla et al., 2025; Puri et al., 2022).
​
However, researchers consistently emphasize that responses vary considerably among species. A nutritional strategy demonstrating favorable microbiome changes in salmonids, for example, may produce different microbial responses in tilapia, carp, sea bass, or shrimp because of differences in digestive physiology, feeding ecology, environmental conditions, and resident microbial communities.
​
Consequently, evidence from one aquaculture species cannot automatically be generalized to others (Kanika et al., 2025; Luan et al., 2023).
Likewise, improvements in microbial composition do not always correspond directly with enhanced production performance. Researchers increasingly recognize that growth should not be considered the sole indicator of nutritional success, since intestinal health, immune competence, and microbial stability provide complementary information about physiological well-being (Singh et al., 2024).
​
Continuing Challenges in Functional Nutrition Research
Despite rapid advances, several important questions remain unresolved. Most available studies evaluate individual functional ingredients over relatively short experimental periods, making it difficult to predict long-term microbiome stability under commercial farming conditions. Furthermore, sequencing technologies have advanced more rapidly than functional analyses, allowing researchers to identify microbial taxa more easily than to determine their precise biological activities (Legrand et al., 2020; Aydın & Çek, 2026).
​
Another challenge is the absence of a universal microbial benchmark for healthy fish. Because microbial communities differ substantially across species and production systems, defining which microbiome changes represent genuine improvement remains an active area of investigation. Increasingly, researchers advocate integrating microbiome sequencing with metabolomics, transcriptomics, and host physiology to better understand how functional feeds influence intestinal ecosystems over time (Legrand et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023).
​
Although many mechanistic questions remain, current evidence consistently supports functional nutrition as an important component of microbiome-aware aquaculture. Rather than focusing solely on nutrient delivery, contemporary feed research increasingly considers how dietary ingredients interact with resident microorganisms and host biology to support long-term intestinal health and sustainable production.
​
Current Research Themes
Research on Microbiome, Gut Health & Functional Nutrition in Aquaculture has expanded rapidly over the past decade, moving beyond descriptive surveys of intestinal microorganisms toward a deeper understanding of their biological functions. Several recurring themes have emerged across fish and shellfish species, highlighting both the promise of microbiome-aware nutrition and the challenges that remain before these discoveries can be broadly translated into commercial aquaculture.
​
Defining a Healthy Microbiome
One of the most significant scientific challenges is the absence of a universally accepted definition of a healthy fish gut microbiome. Unlike many mammalian systems, cultured aquatic species exhibit substantial variation in microbial composition according to species, genetics, developmental stage, habitat, diet, and production environment. As a result, researchers increasingly recognize that healthy microbial communities are context-dependent rather than characterized by a single ideal microbial profile (Tay et al., 2025; Legrand et al., 2020).
​
Understanding Functional Activity
Modern sequencing technologies have made it possible to identify microbial species with unprecedented precision. However, determining what those microorganisms actually do remains considerably more challenging. Increasingly, research integrates genomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and systems biology to investigate microbial metabolism and interactions with host tissues rather than focusing exclusively on microbial taxonomy (Li et al., 2023; De León et al., 2024).
​
Precision Functional Nutrition
Functional feeds continue to represent one of the fastest-growing areas of aquaculture nutrition. Current investigations evaluate probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, phytogenic compounds, alternative proteins, immunostimulatory ingredients, mineral formulations, and postbiotics for their potential to influence microbial ecology while supporting intestinal function. Rather than pursuing generalized nutritional strategies, researchers increasingly envision species-specific approaches tailored to host biology and production systems (Marcharla et al., 2025; Khan, 2026).
​
Sustainable Aquaculture
The microbiome is also becoming central to discussions of sustainability. Alternative feed ingredients, including insect-derived proteins and other novel feed resources, are being evaluated not only for reducing dependence on traditional fishmeal but also for their effects on intestinal microbial communities. This broader perspective recognizes that sustainable nutrition involves maintaining healthy host–microbe interactions alongside responsible resource utilization (Hasan et al., 2023; Aragão et al., 2022).
​
Closing Knowledge Gaps
Despite encouraging progress, several important knowledge gaps remain:
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Overall, current evidence consistently supports the microbiome as an important component of fish health and nutrition. The major scientific challenge is no longer determining whether the microbiome matters, but understanding how species-specific microbial communities can be characterized and supported under diverse aquaculture conditions.
​
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fish gut microbiome?
The fish gut microbiome is the community of microorganisms—including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses—that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. These microorganisms interact with the host and contribute to digestion, nutrient metabolism, immune regulation, and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis.
Why is gut health important in aquaculture?
Gut health influences nutrient utilization, intestinal barrier integrity, immune function, and resilience to environmental stress. Healthy intestinal function supports multiple physiological systems rather than digestion alone.
What causes changes in the fish gut microbiome?
Microbial communities respond to numerous factors, including host species, age, genetics, diet, water quality, salinity, temperature, habitat, and husbandry practices. Because these factors interact continuously, microbiome composition varies considerably across aquaculture systems.
What are probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics?
These are functional nutritional approaches investigated for their ability to influence intestinal microbial communities.
​
-
Probiotics are beneficial live microorganisms.
-
Prebiotics are dietary substrates that support beneficial microbes.
-
Synbiotics combine probiotics and prebiotics.
​
Together, they represent some of the most extensively studied microbiome-directed nutritional strategies in aquaculture.
Does every fish species have the same healthy microbiome?
No. Current evidence indicates that there is no universal microbial profile that defines health across all cultured fish species. Healthy microbial communities appear to be species-specific and influenced by environmental and nutritional factors.
Why is microbiome research expanding so quickly?
Advances in sequencing technology now allow researchers to study microbial communities in far greater detail than previously possible. Combined with growing interest in sustainable aquaculture and functional nutrition, this has made microbiome science one of the fastest-evolving areas of aquatic animal health research.
​
Explore Related Topics
Continue exploring the Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview through these related educational resources:
​
-
Aquaculture & Fish Health Overview
-
Fish Gut Microbiome
-
Probiotics, Prebiotics & Synbiotic
-
Host–Microbe Interactions
​
Research Gap
Why It Matters
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
Host–microbe mechanisms remain incompletely understood
Most studies are short-term and species-specific
Wild and farmed populations remain undercompared
Functional analyses lag behind microbial identification
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
No universal healthy microbiome baseline
Written by Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM
Disclaimer
This content is intended for general educational purposes only and is informed by established veterinary research and consensus. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. For concerns about an individual animals’s health or well-being, consult a licensed veterinarian.
References
-
Aragão, C., Gonçalves, A., Costas, B., Azeredo, R., Xavier, M. J., & Engrola, S. (2022). Alternative proteins for fish diets: Implications beyond growth. Animals, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091211
-
Aydın, F., & Çek, Ĺž. (2026). Mineral-microbiota interactions in aquaculture: Implications for fish gut health and nutrition. Veterinary Research Communications, 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-026-11207-2
-
Baumgärtner, S., James, J., & Ellison, A. (2022). The supplementation of a prebiotic improves the microbial community in the gut and the skin of Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture Reports, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101204
-
Burr, G., Gatlin, D., & Ricke, S. (2005). Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of prebiotics and probiotics in finfish aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 36, 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2005.tb00390.x
-
Butt, R. L., & Volkoff, H. (2019). Gut microbiota and energy homeostasis in fish. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00009
-
Chen, C., Li, P., Liu, L., & Li, Z. (2022). Exploring the interactions between the gut microbiome and the shifting surrounding aquatic environment in fisheries and aquaculture: A review. Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114202
-
Dawood, M. (2020). Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: Important insights for sustainable aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 13, 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12492
-
De León, A. V.-P., et al. (2024). Genomic and functional characterization of the Atlantic salmon gut microbiome in relation to nutrition and health. Nature Microbiology, 9, 3059–3074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01830-7
-
Dehler, C. E., Secombes, C., & Martin, S. (2017). Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr. Aquaculture, 467, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.017
-
Dhanasiri, A., et al. (2023). Effects of dietary supplementation with prebiotics and Pediococcus acidilactici on gut health... Animal Microbiome, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-023-00228-w
-
Diwan, A., Harke, S., & Panche, A. (2023). Host-microbiome interaction in fish and shellfish: An overview. Fish and Shellfish Immunology Reports, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsirep.2023.100091
-
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. (2018). The gut microbiota of marine fish. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873
-
El-Son, M. A. M., et al. (2025). Harnessing the fish gut microbiome and immune system to enhance disease resistance in aquaculture. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2025.110394
-
Hasan, I., Rimoldi, S., Saroglia, G., & Terova, G. (2023). Sustainable fish feeds with insects and probiotics positively affect freshwater and marine fish gut microbiota. Animals, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101633
-
Kanika, N. H., et al. (2025). Fish gut microbiome and its application in aquaculture and biological conservation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1521048
-
Khan, F. (2026). Functional feeds for future aquaculture: A review of nutritional strategies for fish health. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjls.2026.v11i04.002
-
Legrand, T. P. R. A., Wynne, J. W., Weyrich, L., & Oxley, A. (2020). A microbial sea of possibilities: Current knowledge and prospects for an improved understanding of the fish microbiome. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12375
-
Li, M., et al. (2023). Deciphering the gut microbiome of grass carp through multi-omics approach. Microbiome, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01715-7
-
Luan, Y., et al. (2023). The fish microbiota: Research progress and potential applications. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.12.011
-
Marcharla, E., et al. (2025). The role of functional feed in modulating fish gut microbiome to enhance resistance against aquaculture pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-025-10660-w
-
Moroni, F., et al. (2025). One Function, Many Faces: Functional convergence in the gut microbiomes of European marine and freshwater fish. Animals, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192885
-
Nadal, A. L., et al. (2020). Feed, microbiota, and gut immunity: Using the zebrafish model to understand fish health. Frontiers in Immunology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00114
-
Naya-Català, F., et al. (2022). Genetics and nutrition drive the gut microbiota succession... Biology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121744
-
Pérez-Gómez, O., et al. (2025). Dietary administration of postbiotics... Animals, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15131982
-
Puri, P., Sharma, J., & Singh, R. (2022). Biotherapeutic microbial supplementation for ameliorating fish health. Animal Health Research Reviews, 23, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252321000165
-
Rai, N., et al. (2025). Symbiotic strategies: Deciphering the role of gut microbiota in the nutrition and metabolism of fish and shellfish. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1639426
-
Ringø, E., et al. (2016). Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-ending story? Aquaculture Nutrition, 22, 219–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12346
-
Singh, B., et al. (2024). Comparative analysis of marine and freshwater fish gut microbiomes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 101. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiae169
-
Tay, D. D., et al. (2025). The relationship between the gut microbiome and aquacultured fish. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 197, 6314–6357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-025-05330-0
-
Wang, A., Ran, C., Ringø, E., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Progress in fish gastrointestinal microbiota research. Reviews in Aquaculture, 10, 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12191
-
Wang, J., et al. (2021). Microbiota in intestinal digesta of Atlantic salmon... Animal Microbiome, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-021-00075-7
-
Xavier, R., Severino, R., & Silva, S. (2023). Signatures of dysbiosis in fish microbiomes in the context of aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12862
-
Xiong, J., & Nie, L. (2018). Current understanding on the roles of gut microbiota in fish disease and immunity. Zoological Research, 40, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.069
-
Yukgehnaish, K., et al. (2020). Gut microbiota metagenomics in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12, 1903–1927. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12416