Wildlife Health & Disease Ecology
Wildlife health is a foundational component of biodiversity conservation, ecosystem stability, and global public health. Across terrestrial, aquatic, and aerial ecosystems, wildlife populations interact with environmental conditions, domestic animals, and human communities through complex ecological networks. These interactions influence the emergence, transmission, persistence, and evolution of infectious and non-infectious diseases.
'
The field of Wildlife Health & Disease Ecology examines how pathogens, hosts, environments, and ecological processes interact to shape health outcomes in wildlife populations. Rather than focusing solely on individual sick animals, wildlife disease ecology evaluates population-level patterns, ecosystem-level consequences, and the broader implications for conservation and One Health initiatives.
Over the past several decades, researchers have documented increasing numbers of emerging infectious diseases originating at wildlife–human–environment interfaces. Habitat loss, biodiversity decline, urbanization, climate change, globalization, wildlife trade, and changing land-use practices have altered disease dynamics worldwide, creating new opportunities for pathogen transmission and spillover (Daszak et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2008; Allen et al., 2017).
​
At the same time, wildlife health extends beyond infectious disease. Population resilience, nutritional status, genetic diversity, environmental quality, toxic exposures, chronic diseases, reproductive success, and ecosystem disturbances all influence wildlife survival and conservation outcomes (Deem et al., 2001; Karesh, 2024).
​
Understanding these interconnected processes supports more effective conservation strategies, improved disease surveillance systems, stronger biodiversity protection efforts, and enhanced preparedness for emerging health threats.​​
​
What This Major Pillar Covers
This major pillar explores the scientific principles governing wildlife health and disease dynamics in natural ecosystems.
Key topics include:
​
-
Ecological drivers of wildlife diseases
-
Host–pathogen interactions
-
Disease transmission pathways
-
Emerging infectious diseases
-
Wildlife reservoirs and spillover events
-
Population health monitoring
-
Wildlife disease surveillance
-
Conservation medicine
-
One Health applications
-
Biodiversity and ecosystem health relationships
-
Human influences on disease emergence
-
Population-level impacts of disease
The pillar serves as an entry point to specialized educational resources within the Wildlife & Conservation Health system.
​
Why This Area Matters
Wildlife diseases influence much more than individual animals. Disease processes can affect population persistence, species recovery programs, ecosystem function, agricultural systems, and public health outcomes.
​
Several major conservation challenges have demonstrated the profound effects of disease on wildlife populations across different environmental media. Examples include amphibian chytridiomycosis in freshwater ecosystems, white-nose syndrome in bats, transmissible clonal cancers in Tasmanian devils, chronic wasting disease in terrestrial cervids, and devastating outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) affecting global marine and aerial bird populations. These diseases have altered population trajectories, affected biodiversity, and challenged traditional wildlife management approaches (Voyles et al., 2014; Hamede et al., 2020; Thompson et al., 2023).
​
Wildlife health also has direct implications for human societies. Many emerging infectious diseases affecting people have origins linked to wildlife reservoirs or wildlife-associated ecological systems. Understanding these relationships is a central objective of modern One Health research (Cunningham et al., 2017; Nichol, 2024).
​
As environmental changes accelerate worldwide, wildlife health science continues to play an increasingly important role in conservation planning, disease prevention strategies, ecological restoration efforts, and public health preparedness.
​
How This Major Pillar Relates to Wildlife & Conservation Health
Wildlife Health & Disease Ecology is a core pillar within the broader Wildlife & Conservation Health system.
​
The Wildlife & Conservation Health framework recognizes that animal health, ecosystem integrity, and environmental sustainability are interconnected. Disease processes cannot be fully understood without considering habitat quality, biodiversity patterns, species interactions, and anthropogenic influences.
​
Readers seeking an overview of the entire system can begin with the Wildlife & Conservation Health Overview.
This pillar expands upon that foundation by focusing specifically on the ecological and epidemiological processes that shape wildlife health outcomes.
​
Key Concepts Within This Pillar
Several foundational concepts appear repeatedly throughout wildlife health research:
​
Disease Ecology
Disease ecology examines interactions among pathogens, hosts, vectors, and environmental conditions that influence disease occurrence and transmission (Tompkins et al., 2011).
​
One Health
The One Health approach recognizes that human, animal, and environmental health are interconnected systems that require collaborative solutions (Buttke et al., 2015; Goulet et al., 2024).
​
Spillover
Spillover refers to the transmission of pathogens from one host population into another, including movement from wildlife into domestic animals or humans (Rhyan & Spraker, 2010).
​
Wildlife Reservoirs
Some wildlife species can maintain pathogens within populations and contribute to disease persistence or transmission under specific ecological conditions (Williams et al., 2002).
​
Population Health
Population health evaluates disease impacts across groups of animals rather than focusing solely on individual cases. Researchers assess mortality, reproduction, survival, population growth, and long-term persistence (Russell et al., 2020).
​
Conservation Medicine
Conservation medicine integrates ecological, veterinary, and public health disciplines to address health challenges affecting wildlife, ecosystems, and people (Daszak et al., 2004; Lanfranchi et al., 2003).
​
Wildlife Disease Ecology
Wildlife disease ecology explores how biological, environmental, and social factors influence disease patterns in free-ranging animal populations. It represents the intersection of ecology, epidemiology, veterinary science, conservation biology, and evolutionary biology.
Unlike traditional clinical medicine, which focuses primarily on diagnosing and treating individual animals, wildlife disease ecology seeks to understand disease processes at broader ecological scales. Researchers investigate how pathogens spread through populations, persist within ecosystems, evolve over time, and interact with changing environmental conditions.
​
Disease emergence and transmission are shaped by a complex network of interacting factors. Host density, species diversity, movement patterns, migration routes, reproductive cycles, climatic conditions, habitat fragmentation, food availability, and interspecies interactions all contribute to disease dynamics (Uchii et al., 2011; White et al., 2018).
​
Population density often influences opportunities for pathogen transmission. However, disease behavior in wildlife systems rarely follows simple patterns. Research suggests that ecological complexity, social structures, environmental variability, and host behavior frequently influence transmission outcomes beyond density alone (Lloyd-Smith et al., 2005).
​
Wildlife disease ecology also examines evolutionary processes. Pathogens and hosts continuously adapt to one another, creating dynamic relationships that shape disease susceptibility, resistance, and persistence over time (Wal et al., 2014; LaCava et al., 2021).
Social behavior represents another important factor. Network-based studies demonstrate that animal interactions influence disease spread within populations. Understanding social structure can improve surveillance strategies and disease monitoring programs (Silk et al., 2019; Booth et al., 2025).
​
Environmental change remains one of the most influential drivers of wildlife disease ecology. Habitat modification, deforestation, agricultural expansion, urbanization, the introduction of invasive species, and climate-related environmental shifts alter wildlife distributions and pathogen transmission pathways (Daszak et al., 2001; Meentemeyer et al., 2012; Hassell et al., 2017).
​
Modern wildlife disease ecology increasingly relies on interdisciplinary approaches. Researchers integrate field surveillance, ecological modeling, genomics, landscape analysis, remote sensing, and population monitoring to better understand disease systems (Blanchong et al., 2016; Roberts et al., 2021).
​
Learn more in our guide to Wildlife Disease Ecology.
​
Emerging Diseases in Wildlife
Emerging diseases in wildlife have become one of the most important areas of study within conservation biology, veterinary medicine, and public health. An emerging disease may be defined as a newly recognized disease, a disease that is expanding geographically, a pathogen infecting new host species, or a previously controlled disease that is increasing in prevalence or impact (Williams et al., 2002; Tompkins et al., 2015).
​
The increasing frequency of emerging infectious diseases has drawn attention to the complex relationships linking wildlife, domestic animals, humans, and environmental change. Research indicates that a substantial proportion of emerging infectious diseases affecting humans originate in wildlife reservoirs or wildlife-associated ecological systems (Jones et al., 2008; Allen et al., 2017).
​
Drivers of Disease Emergence
Disease emergence rarely results from a single factor. Instead, it often reflects multiple ecological and anthropogenic pressures acting simultaneously.
​
Key drivers include:
​
-
Habitat destruction and fragmentation
-
Deforestation
-
Agricultural expansion
-
Urbanization
-
Climate change
-
Wildlife trade
-
Increased global transportation
-
Human encroachment into natural habitats
-
Changes in biodiversity and species composition
These factors influence contact rates among wildlife, livestock, and people, creating new opportunities for pathogen transmission and adaptation (Daszak et al., 2001; Tazerji et al., 2022; Rulli et al., 2025).
​
Urbanization has emerged as a particularly important driver of disease emergence. As cities expand into wildlife habitats, interactions among wildlife, domestic animals, and humans increase, creating novel disease transmission pathways (Hassell et al., 2017).
​
Wildlife Reservoirs and Spillover Events
Many emerging pathogens persist naturally within wildlife populations without causing obvious disease in reservoir hosts. Under specific ecological conditions, these pathogens may spill over into domestic animals or human populations.
​
Spillover events are influenced by:
​
-
Host abundance
-
Species diversity
-
Environmental conditions
-
Human activities
-
Livestock management systems
-
Wildlife movement patterns
Understanding spillover dynamics has become a major research priority within One Health and conservation medicine initiatives (Rhyan & Spraker, 2010; Saldaña et al., 2023).
​
Research involving bats, rodents, primates, ungulates, and other wildlife species continues to improve understanding of how pathogen reservoirs contribute to disease emergence at local and global scales (Field, 2009; Johnson et al., 2020).
​
Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Emerging Disease Risk
Scientists increasingly recognize that biodiversity loss can influence disease dynamics. Alterations in ecosystem structure may change host communities, vector populations, and transmission networks.
​
This dynamic is often explored through the "dilution effect" hypothesis, which suggests that high biodiversity can buffer disease risk by reducing the relative density of highly competent reservoir hosts. While biodiversity decline is frequently associated with an increased risk of specific infectious diseases and reduced ecosystem resilience, the relationship is highly context-dependent; in some ecosystems, intact biodiversity can conversely present an "amplification effect" by maintaining a broader pool of diverse pathogens (Schmeller et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021).
​
Conservation strategies increasingly incorporate health considerations because disease emergence is often linked to broader environmental disturbances rather than isolated biological events.
​
Surveillance and Early Detection
Effective surveillance systems are essential for identifying emerging diseases before large-scale ecological impacts occur.
Modern wildlife disease surveillance incorporates:
​
-
Field observations
-
Necropsy investigations
-
Laboratory diagnostics
-
Molecular epidemiology
-
Genomic analysis
-
Environmental sampling
-
Population monitoring
Advances in genomics, non-invasive sampling techniques, and large-scale surveillance networks have improved the ability to detect novel pathogens and monitor disease trends across wildlife populations (Watsa, 2020; Schilling et al., 2022; Pepin et al., 2025).
​
Emerging Diseases and Conservation Challenges
Emerging diseases can threaten wildlife conservation by reducing population size, altering reproductive success, increasing mortality, and affecting species recovery programs.
Examples include:
​
-
Chytridiomycosis in amphibians: An introduced fungal panzootic causing widespread global declines in aquatic ecosystems.
-
White-nose syndrome in bats: A cold-loving fungal pathogen causing severe mortality in hibernating cave bat populations.
-
Devil facial tumor disease in Tasmanian devils: A rare form of clonally transmissible cancer that evades the host immune system.
-
Chronic wasting disease in cervids: A highly persistent prion disease that contaminates the environmental matrix.
-
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in wild birds: A rapidly mutating viral pathogen disrupting aerial, terrestrial, and marine mammal populations globally.
These examples illustrate how disease can become a significant conservation threat when ecological conditions facilitate pathogen spread or when vulnerable species possess limited resilience to disease pressures (Medina-Vogel, 2013; Langwig et al., 2015; Hamede et al., 2020).
Learn more in our guide to Emerging Diseases in Wildlife.
​
Wildlife Population Health
Wildlife population health examines the collective health status of animal populations and the ecological factors that influence long-term population viability. This field extends beyond individual disease cases to evaluate how health influences population persistence, demographic stability, reproductive success, and ecosystem function.
​
Population health assessments help researchers understand whether diseases, environmental stressors, nutritional limitations, or habitat changes are affecting wildlife populations at meaningful ecological scales.
​
Defining Population Health
​
Population health incorporates multiple dimensions, including:
​
-
Survival rates
-
Reproductive success
-
Age structure
-
Population growth
-
Mortality patterns
-
Genetic diversity
-
Disease prevalence
-
Habitat quality
A population may appear numerically stable while experiencing underlying health challenges that affect long-term resilience. Consequently, population health assessments often combine ecological, epidemiological, and demographic indicators (Russell et al., 2020).
​
Disease Impacts on Wildlife Populations
Diseases influence populations in different ways depending on pathogen characteristics, host susceptibility, environmental conditions, and population structure.
​
Potential population-level effects include:
​
-
Increased mortality
-
Reduced fertility
-
Lower juvenile survival
-
Altered migration behavior
-
Changes in social structure
-
Reduced genetic diversity
-
Population declines
Some diseases produce dramatic and immediate declines, while others generate subtle effects that become evident only through long-term monitoring (Tompkins et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2023).
​
Researchers increasingly recognize that disease impacts cannot be fully understood without considering broader ecological contexts, including food availability, environmental stressors, predation pressures, and habitat conditions.
​
Monitoring Wildlife Population Health
Wildlife health surveillance programs provide essential information for population assessments.
​
Monitoring activities may include:
​
-
Population surveys
-
Disease surveillance
-
Mortality investigations
-
Health assessments
-
Genetic analyses
-
Environmental monitoring
-
Long-term ecological studies
Surveillance systems generate information that helps scientists detect emerging threats, evaluate disease prevalence, and identify changing population trends (Artois et al., 2008; Walton et al., 2016).
​
Recent advances in statistical modeling have also improved the estimation of disease prevalence in free-ranging wildlife populations, supporting more robust surveillance efforts (Booth et al., 2023).
​
Wildlife Health and Ecosystem Function
Healthy wildlife populations contribute to ecosystem stability through pollination, seed dispersal, predator-prey interactions, nutrient cycling, and habitat modification.
​
Disease-related population changes can alter ecosystem processes, sometimes producing cascading ecological effects. These consequences highlight the importance of viewing wildlife health within broader ecosystem frameworks rather than as an isolated veterinary issue (Deem et al., 2001; Karesh, 2024).
​
One Health and Population-Level Perspectives
The One Health framework increasingly emphasizes the health of wildlife populations because they are important components of interconnected environmental systems.
​
Wildlife health indicators can provide insights into:
​
-
Environmental change
-
Ecosystem stress
-
Biodiversity trends
-
Disease emergence risks
-
Human–animal–environment interactions
This broader perspective supports collaborative approaches involving wildlife biologists, veterinarians, epidemiologists, conservation scientists, policymakers, and public health professionals (Buttke et al., 2015; Goulet et al., 2024).
​
Learn more in our guide to Wildlife Population Health.
​
Current Research Themes
Wildlife Health & Disease Ecology remains a rapidly evolving scientific field. Current research themes include:
​
-
Emerging infectious disease surveillance
-
Pathogen spillover prediction models
-
Wildlife–livestock–human interfaces
-
Climate change and disease ecology
-
Biodiversity loss and disease emergence
-
Wildlife genomics and epidemiology
-
Landscape epidemiology
-
Non-invasive disease surveillance methods
-
Wildlife social networks and disease transmission
-
Wildlife population resilience
-
Conservation medicine applications
-
One Health surveillance frameworks
-
Migratory wildlife disease ecology
-
Wildlife disease risk prioritization
-
Ecosystem-based health assessment approaches
Increasingly, researchers are adopting interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecology, epidemiology, genomics, conservation science, and environmental monitoring to better understand disease dynamics across complex ecological systems.
​
Frequently Asked Questions
What is wildlife disease ecology?
​
Wildlife disease ecology is the study of how pathogens, hosts, and environmental factors interact to influence disease occurrence, transmission, and impacts in wildlife populations.
​
Why is wildlife health important?
Wildlife health supports biodiversity conservation, ecosystem stability, environmental resilience, and One Health objectives that connect animal, human, and environmental health.
​
What causes emerging diseases in wildlife?
​
Emerging diseases are influenced by factors such as habitat change, biodiversity loss, urbanization, climate change, wildlife trade, globalization, and changing interactions among wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.
​
What is pathogen spillover?
​
Pathogen spillover occurs when an infectious agent moves from one host population into another, such as transmission from wildlife to livestock or humans.
​
How are wildlife diseases monitored?
​
Scientists use surveillance systems that combine field observations, laboratory diagnostics, necropsies, molecular testing, ecological monitoring, and population health assessments.
​
How is wildlife health related to conservation?
​
Disease can influence survival, reproduction, population growth, and species persistence. Understanding wildlife health helps conservation programs identify threats and support long-term biodiversity protection.
​
Explore Related Topics
Wildlife & Conservation Health Overview
Explore the broader Wildlife & Conservation Health system and its interconnected educational resources.
​
Wildlife Disease Ecology
Explore ecological drivers of disease transmission, host–pathogen relationships, and ecosystem influences on wildlife diseases.
​
Emerging Diseases in Wildlife
Learn about pathogen emergence, spillover events, wildlife reservoirs, and disease surveillance systems.
​
Wildlife Population Health
Explore population monitoring, demographic health indicators, ecosystem resilience, and conservation outcomes.
Written by Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM
Disclaimer
This content is intended for general educational purposes only and is informed by established veterinary research and consensus. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. For concerns about an individual animals’s health or well-being, consult a licensed veterinarian.
References
-
Aguirre, A. A. (2017). Changing patterns of emerging zoonotic diseases in wildlife, domestic animals, and humans linked to biodiversity loss and globalization. ILAR Journal, 58(3), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilx035
-
Allen, T., Murray, K. A., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Morse, S. S., Rondinini, C., Di Marco, M., Breit, N., Olival, K. J., & Daszak, P. (2017). Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases. Nature Communications, 8, Article 1124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00923-8
-
Artois, M., Bengis, R., Delahay, R., Duchene, M., Duff, J., Ferroglio, E., Gortázar, C., Hutchings, M. R., Kock, R., Leighton, F., Mörner, T., & Smith, G. C. (2008). Wildlife disease surveillance and monitoring. In Management of Disease in Wild Mammals (pp. 187–213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-77134-0_10
-
Blanchong, J. A., Robinson, S. J., Samuel, M. D., & Foster, J. T. (2016). Application of genetics and genomics to wildlife epidemiology. Journal of Wildlife Management, 80(4), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.1064
-
Booth, J. G., Hanley, B. J., Hodel, F. H., Jennelle, C. S., Guinness, J., Them, C. E., Mitchell, C., Ahmed, M. S., & Schuler, K. (2023). Sample size for estimating disease prevalence in free-ranging wildlife populations: A Bayesian modeling approach. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 28, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00578-7
-
Booth, J. G., Hanley, B. J., Thompson, N. E., Crespo, C., Christensen, S., Jennelle, C. S., Caudell, J., Delisle, Z. J., Guinness, J., Hollingshead, N. A., Them, C. E., & Schuler, K. (2025). Management agencies can leverage animal social structure for wildlife disease surveillance. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. https://doi.org/10.7589/jwd-d-24-00079
-
Buttke, D. E., Decker, D. J., & Wild, M. A. (2015). The role of One Health in wildlife conservation: A challenge and opportunity. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 51(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7589/2014-01-004
-
Cunningham, A. A., Daszak, P., & Wood, J. L. N. (2017). One Health, emerging infectious diseases and wildlife: Two decades of progress? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1725). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0167
-
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2000). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—Threats to biodiversity and human health. Science, 287(5452), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5452.443
-
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2001). Anthropogenic environmental change and the emergence of infectious diseases in wildlife. Acta Tropica, 78(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00179-0
-
Daszak, P., Tabor, G. M., Kilpatrick, A. M., Epstein, J., & Plowright, R. (2004). Conservation medicine and a new agenda for emerging diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1026, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1307.001
-
Deem, S. L., Karesh, W. B., & Weisman, W. (2001). Putting theory into practice: Wildlife health in conservation. Conservation Biology, 15(5), 1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00336.x
-
Field, H. E. (2009). Bats and emerging zoonoses: Henipaviruses and SARS. Zoonoses and Public Health, 56(6–7), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01218.x
-
Goulet, C., De Garine-Wichatitsky, M., Chardonnet, P., De Klerk, L., Kock, R., Muset, S., Suu-Ire, R., & Caron, A. (2024). An operational framework for wildlife health in the One Health approach. One Health, 19, 100922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100922
-
Hamede, R. K., Owen, R. S., Siddle, H., Peck, S., Jones, M. E., Dujon, A., Giraudeau, M., Roche, B., Ujvari, B., & Thomas, F. (2020). The ecology and evolution of wildlife cancers: Applications for management and conservation. Evolutionary Applications, 13(7), 1719–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12948
-
Hassell, J. M., Begon, M., Ward, M. J., & Fèvre, E. M. (2017). Urbanization and disease emergence: Dynamics at the wildlife–livestock–human interface. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.012
-
Johnson, C. K., Hitchens, P. L., Pandit, P. S., Rushmore, J., Evans, T. S., Young, C. C. W., & Doyle, M. M. (2020). Global shifts in mammalian population trends reveal key predictors of virus spillover risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1924). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2736
-
Jones, K. E., Patel, N. G., Levy, M. A., Storeygard, A., Balk, D., Gittleman, J. L., & Daszak, P. (2008). Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature, 451(7181), 990–993. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06536
-
Karesh, W. B. (2024). Shifting from wildlife disease threats to wildlife health. Revue Scientifique et Technique, Special Edition, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.se.3568
-
Langwig, K. E., Voyles, J., Wilber, M. Q., Frick, W. F., Murray, K. A., Bolker, B. M., Collins, J. P., Cheng, T. L., Fisher, M. C., Hoyt, J. R., Lindner, D. L., McCallum, H., Puschendorf, R., Rosenblum, E. B., Toothman, M. H., Willis, C. K. R., Briggs, C. J., & Kilpatrick, A. M. (2015). Context-dependent conservation responses to emerging wildlife diseases. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13(4), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1890/140241
-
Lloyd-Smith, J. O., Cross, P. C., Briggs, C. J., Daugherty, M., Getz, W. M., Latto, J., Sanchez, M. S., Smith, A. B., & Swei, A. (2005). Should we expect population thresholds for wildlife disease? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.004
-
Medina-Vogel, G. (2013). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife and species conservation. Microbiology Spectrum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.OH-0004-2012
-
Nichol, A. A. (2024). Emerging infectious diseases at the intersections of human, animal, and environmental health. AMA Journal of Ethics, 26(2), E99–E102. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.99
-
Pepin, K. M., Combs, M., Bastille-Rousseau, G., Craft, M., Cross, P. C., Diuk-Wasser, M., Gagne, R. B., Gallo, T., Garwood, T., Heale, J., Malmberg, J. L., Mullinax, J., Smith, L., & colleagues. (2025). Expanding national-scale wildlife disease surveillance systems with research networks. Ecology and Evolution, 15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71492
-
Rhyan, J. C., & Spraker, T. R. (2010). Emergence of diseases from wildlife reservoirs. Veterinary Pathology, 47(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985809354466
-
Roberts, M. G., Dobson, A. P., Restif, O., & Wells, K. (2021). Challenges in modelling the dynamics of infectious diseases at the wildlife–human interface. Epidemics, 37, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100523
-
Russell, R. E., Direnzo, G. V., Szymanski, J. A., Alger, K. E., & Grant, E. H. C. (2020). Principles and mechanisms of wildlife population persistence in the face of disease. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.569016
-
Saldaña, F., Stollenwerk, N., Van Dierdonck, J. B., & Aguiar, M. (2023). Modeling spillover dynamics: Understanding emerging pathogens of public health concern. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60661-y
-
Schilling, A. K., Mazzamuto, M. V., & Romeo, C. (2022). A review of non-invasive sampling in wildlife disease and health research. Animals, 12(13), 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131719
-
Schmeller, D. S., Courchamp, F., & Killeen, G. (2020). Biodiversity loss, emerging pathogens and human health risks. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(11), 3095–3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02021-6
-
Tompkins, D. M., Carver, S., Jones, M. E., Krkošek, M., & Skerratt, L. F. (2015). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: A critical perspective. Trends in Parasitology, 31(4), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.01.007
-
Tompkins, D. M., Dunn, A. M., Smith, M. J., & Telfer, S. (2011). Wildlife diseases: From individuals to ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01742.x
-
Walton, L., Marion, G., Davidson, R. S., White, P. C. L., Smith, L. A., Gavier-Widén, D., Yon, L., Hannant, D., & Hutchings, M. R. (2016). The ecology of wildlife disease surveillance: Demographic and prevalence fluctuations undermine surveillance. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(5), 1460–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12671
-
Wang, Y. X. G., Matson, K. D., Santini, L., Visconti, P., Hilbers, J. P., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Xu, Y., Prins, H. H. T., Allen, T., Huang, Z. Y. X., & De Boer, W. F. (2021). Mammal assemblage composition predicts global patterns in emerging infectious disease risk. Global Change Biology, 27(20), 4995–5007. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15784
-
Watsa, M. (2020). Rigorous wildlife disease surveillance. Science, 369(6500), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc0017
-
White, L. A., Forester, J. D., & Craft, M. E. (2018). Dynamic, spatial models of parasite transmission in wildlife: Their structure, applications and remaining challenges. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(3), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12761
-
Williams, E. S., Yuill, T., Artois, M., Fischer, J., & Haigh, S. A. (2002). Emerging infectious diseases in wildlife. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 21(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.21.1.1327